Quantcast
Channel: Underpaintings
Viewing all 214 articles
Browse latest View live

Arcadia Contemporary at the L.A. Art Show

$
0
0

Brad Kunkle
Carosella
32 X 26 in.


SoHo's Arcadia Contemporary has once again headed to California to participate in the L.A. Art Show,  the largest and most successful venue for buying and selling contemporary and traditional artwork in the West.  Arcadia, a big draw at whatever show in which it participates in, has marked the occasion by bringing with them several new artworks by artists who have only recently debuted with the gallery, including Henrik Uldalen, Stephen Mackey, and Alexander Timofeev.  If you are in Los Angeles between tomorrow and Sunday, stop in to see the paintings and sculptures in person, and then stay to check out the other 130+ galleries represented at this year's event!


LA ART SHOW DATES AND TIMES

Wednesday, January 15th, 2014  -  Opening Night Reception 8pm - 11pm
Thursday, January 16th  -  11am -7pm
Friday, January 17th  -  11am - 7pm
Saturday, January 18th  -  11am - 7pm
Sunday, January 19th  -  11am - 5pm



Gregory Mortenson
Unicorn
15 X 12 in.

Sam Wolfe Connelly
Self-Portrait, Drowned
30 X 20 in.

Alexander Timofeev
Pearls
28 X 20 in.

Daniel Ochoa
Platform a Noche
56 X 56 in.

Kim Cogan
Midnight Maraud
30 X 45 in.

Henrik Uldalen
Suspend
35 X 54 in.

Casey Baugh
Transfixed
32 X 34 in.

Danny Galieote
Red Carpet Knockout

Malcolm Liepke
Streetwise
38 X 32 in.

Michael Carson
Waiting for the Stage
60 X 48 in.

Stephen Mackey
Somnambulist as a Bride Ascending a Staircase Backward
19 X 14 in.

Deon Duncan
Ascension
33 X 9 X 6 in.

Matthew Cornell
Awakening
9 X 12 in.

Mary Jane Ansell
Hope and the Reckoning
28 X 40 in.








Gainsborough and the Real Professor Moriarty

$
0
0

In September 1841, a significant discovery was made when a theretofore missing painting by Thomas Gainsborough was found hanging in the parlor of Mrs. Anne Maginnis, a retired schoolmistress living in England.  The picture was a circa 1787 portrait of Georgiana Cavendish (née Spencer), 5th Duchess of Devonshire – a woman "once celebrated as the fairest and wickedest in all of England."¹  It had disappeared around 1792, not long after the Duke of Devonshire had learned that his wife had become pregnant by her lover, Charles Grey, the 2nd Earl Grey, but how Mrs. Maginnis' husband had acquired the portrait remains a mystery.  When the painting was rediscovered by the art dealer John Bentley hanging above the elderly owner's mantlepiece (Mrs. Maginnis had actually cut the legs off the portrait so it could fit in that space), Bentley became determined to buy it.  Eventually, Mrs. Maginnis acceded, and the portrait passed into Bentley's hands for the price of 56 guineas.


Thomas Gainsborough
Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire (c. 1787)
oil


Bentley retained possession of the portrait until the 1860s, when he sold the painting for an undisclosed sum to Wynn Ellis, a silk merchant and Member of Parliament who owned one of the largest art collections in England.  When Ellis passed away in 1875, he bequeathed his collection  of more than 400 paintings to the National Gallery, which promptly turned about and sold 44 of the best works through the auctioneers Mssrs. Christie, Manson, and Woods of London in May of 1876.  Gainsborough's Duchess of Devonshire, was the highlight of the auction, and after some spirited bidding, the portrait went to the art dealer William Agnew for 10,000 guineas – or about $600,000 in today's currency – the most ever paid for the work of a British artist at that time.


Sir Joshua Reynolds
Study of Georgiana Spencer


Agnew prominently displayed the painting in his Bond Street gallery, and soon Georgiana-mania took hold of London.  Poets wrote odes to the Duchess; her exploits – real or imaginary – began appearing in the social pages; Victorian ladies began emulating her fashions, from powdering the skin and rouging the cheeks and lips, to adopting wide-brimmed and lavishly-plummed bonnets;  and members of global high society began arriving in carriages to pay to the Lady their respects.  All this attention only added to the painting's cachet, and Agnew was, in short order, able to broker a secret deal to sell the portrait for $50,000 to the American banker and financier Junius Spencer Morgan, who, as a distant relative of Georgiana, coveted the portrait.  But before it had passed a month that the Duchess of Devonshire was installed in Agnew's gallery, and before the eager Morgan was able to procure the work, the portrait once again mysteriously disappeared.


Keira Knightley (foreground) as Georgiana Cavendish in The Duchess (Paramount Vantage/Pathé 2008)


It was to Agnew's great misfortune that at the same moment he was celebrating what should have been a great success, that another man, a clever, master criminal by the name of Adam Worth, found himself in desperate need.

Worth (whose original surname was likely "Werth"), had been born to a poor Jewish family in Germany in 1844, and was raised from the age of five in Cambridge, Massachusetts.  At the age of fourteen, hoping to escape his childhood destitution, he he ran away from home, and for the next several years, he bounced around, from city to city, before finally obtaining a respectable position as a clerk in a New York City department store.  But perhaps after spending so many years living by his wits, a pedantic lifestyle such as that of a clerk could not hold his interest very long, and after only a month there, the 17 year old lied about his age and enlisted in the Union Army in order to fight in the American Civil War.  He rose quickly in the ranks, achieving Sergeant within only two months, but at his first major battle, the Second Battle of Bull Run on August 30th, 1862, he was mortally wounded, and after several weeks of care at a Georgetown hospital, the 18 year old Adam Worth died . . . for the first time.

It is uncertain whether it was the accidental result of the hospital misfiling paperwork or the intentional switching of identities by Worth, but the young and quite-healthy soldier (his injuries at Bull Run were rather minor) saw an advantage to his "death:" he could now re-enlist under a new name, receive a bounty for signing-on, and then desert with the money in his pocket.  The plan worked so well, that Worth became a professional bounty jumper, enlisting with and defecting from several regiments, both Union and Confederate.  Though this enterprise was not without its dangers, Worth found it to be quite lucrative, and would have likely and happily continued the practice for years, had not the war come to an end, and Worth was forced to seek a new manner of income.

Moving to New York City;  a place which attracted criminals of every different social standing, from cutthroats to crooked politicians; the 20 year old Worth fell in with Sophie Lyons, the self-styled Queen of New York's Underworld, who taught the young man to pick pockets.  The nimble "Little Adam"– he was only 5'4"– took to his new craft easily, and in short order had had so much success that he was able to finance his own pick-pocketing syndicate.  But just as his reputation and his purse were beginning to grow, Worth was caught stealing a package from an Adams Express truck and, late in 1864, was sentenced to three years in New York's infamous Sing Sing Prison.

Nicknamed the "Bastille on the Hudson," Sing Sing was a brutal environment, and Worth vowed to leave it as soon as possible.  Putting his naturally keen observation skills to good use, Worth marked the movements of the guards, and after only a few weeks of incarceration, used the moment of a shift change to quietly slip away.  Hiding in muddy drainage ditches, stowing aboard a canal boat being ported downriver, and swimming in the cold and polluted waters of the Hudson, Worth made his way back to New York City where his friends clothed him, and absorbed him back into their ranks.

Once again in the Bowery, Worth had the opportunity to reflect upon his life of crime.  He had firsthand knowledge that the potential consequences of petty thievery far outweighed the meager rewards it returned.  But rather than being swayed from his criminal course, this realization only convinced him that he needed to make the payouts bigger, while shifting the risks to someone other than himself.  Using his knack for planning, Worth set himself up as the brain, while his gang became his limbs, carrying out successful crimes throughout the city, from which Worth would take a generous share.

"He ruled the shrewdest criminals and planned deeds for them with craft that bade defiance to the best detective talent in the world." - The Greatest Criminal of the Past Century:  Adam Worth

Taking his cues from a new mentor, Fredericka "Marm" Mandelbaum – "the most successful fence in the history of New York"– Worth skillfully moved himself away from lowly street crime, and into the more lucrative world of store and bank robberies.  The plans he engineered were ingenious, and above all, safe for all of those involved, and Worth soon became admired by his peers as a master of his craft.  But when one of his successful schemes, a nearly one-million dollar theft from a Boston bank, threatened to bring too much scrutiny on "Marm" and her operations, Worth boarded a ship and sailed to England, thereby diverting attention away from friend, while putting himself in a prime location to exert an even greater influence on the world.

"He sits motionless, like a spider in the centre of its web, but that web has a thousand radiations, and he knows well every quiver of each of them. He does little himself. He only plans. But his agents are numerous and splendidly organised. Is there a crime to be done, a paper to be abstracted, we will say, a house to be rifled, a man to be removed - the word is passed to the Professor, the matter is organised and carried out. The agent may be caught. In that case money is found for his bail or his defence. But the central power which uses the agent is never caught - never so much as suspected."                                -Sir Arthur Conan Doyle The Final Problem


By 1876, Worth had made quite a reputation for himself under the alias of Henry J. Raymond, a name he had borrowed from the founder and editor of The New York Times.  With a fortune secretly gained through a criminal network extending from London to Constantinople, onwards to Cape Town, across the sea to Kingston, and back north to Boston,  Worth – as Raymond – had become a regular member of high society, with fancy clothes, palatial apartments in Piccadilly, his own racing stables, and a 110-foot steam yacht.  And although he had suffered a recent setback when he bankrupted himself to secure the release of members of his syndicate from a Turkish prison, he was on the road to financial recovery when he heard some unwelcome news.

"He never forsook a friend or accomplice."- The Greatest Criminal of the Past Century:  Adam Worth

His younger and incompetent brother, John, had been arrested in France trying to pass forged bank notes, and was subsequently extradited to England.  This was a maneuver by Scotland Yard designed to punish the older Worth, whom the authorities knew to be a criminal, but against whom they had not been able to bring any charges.  Worth wanted his brother released as soon as possible, and had enough money to post the younger man's bond, but according to English law, only a person who owned real estate and had a good reputation could act as a bondsman, and the police were well aware that Worth had neither.

Enter The Duchess of Devonshire.

Worth developed a plan to release his brother that was bold yet simple.  He would steal the most famous painting in London and ransom it, not for money, but for the loan of a respectable freeholder.  If William Agnew would just put up the bond and vouch for John Worth, the painting would be returned.  


Sir John Bernard Partridge
Au Revoir! (Punch Magazine, February 20, 1907)
15 ⅜ X 11 ¾ in.
pen and ink


After a simple reconnoitering of the gallery in the guise of Henry Raymond, Worth returned to Bond Street a few nights later with two of his associates.  One of the men acted as a lookout, while the other served as a ladder, and within moments, Worth was prying open a second-floor window and heading straight towards the Duchess.  As the security guard snoozed on the floor below, Worth carefully cut the painting from its stretcher, moistened its back with paste to make it supple, and, with the image facing outwards so as not to cause cracking, carefully rolled the canvas up.  He slipped this tube into his frock coat, climbed back outside the window, and then casually strolled through the fog back to Piccadilly with his two henchmen in tow.  In a matter of moments, the most famous painting in England had been stolen.

But before Worth could carry out his plan, he found that he no longer had need of the painting.  The lawyers he had hired to represent his brother had succeeded in getting the younger Worth released on a technicality.  What then was Worth to do with the Duchess?

He could not sell the painting;  it had been famous before the theft, and afterwards, it was infamous.  It was a "white elephant," and because of its notoriety, he would never find a buyer for the stolen work.

He could destroy it, and be done with the problem, but surely that would have been a waste, and Worth was not a wasteful man.

Or he could try to ransom the work back to William Agnew, who had already posted a £1000 offer of reward for the painting.  This was the course Worth's confederates wanted to take, and so, Worth, through intermediaries, tried to negotiate a price which would ensure the painting's return. £25,000 was demanded for the painting, and though there seemed to be an agreement on the bargain, neither side seemed really committed to the exchange;  Agnew, probably because the price was so steep and the likelihood of the painting's actual return seemingly so slim, and Worth for a reason which no one cold have predicted.

Adam Worth had fallen in love with The Duchess of Devonshire.

For the next quarter of a century, the picture remained with Worth.  It traveled everywhere with him, from city to city and across the sea, in a specially-made, false-bottomed steamer trunk.  During the night, he would sleep with the painting, sandwiched between two planks and placed under his mattress.  He began referring to the Duchess as his "Nobel Lady," and to his theft of the work as their "elopement," and was known to have purchased gifts for her, including a hunting coat.  And during one of his most successful thefts, a $700,000 diamond heist in South Africa, Worth used the painting as inspiration for his disguise, saying he was in the country to purchase ostrich feathers for the women back in Britain who had adopted the fashion of wearing plumed Gainsborough hats.  Worth did not separate himself from the painting until he married, at which point he secreted the Duchess  in Philadelphia while he lived with his wife and two children back in England.  Every time he visited America, however, he would also visit the Duchess, moving her to a new location afterwards to ensure her safety.


Sir Joshua Reynolds
Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, with her daughter, Lady Georgiana Cavendish


In 1892, Worth made a rare mistake, and during a somewhat improvised robbery attempt of a registered mail carriage in Belgium, he was caught.  A former accomplice of Worth's who was in prison and felt that he had been snubbed by the man, wrote a letter to the authorities listing every deed the criminal had ever carried off (and some that he had not), thus unmasking Worth.  And soon detective agencies from around the world, with the exception of Pinkerton's, started coming forward to verify Worth's true criminal identity.  There was no way out, and Worth's empire began to crumble.

He was sentenced to seven years in solitary confinement in Belgium, of which he only served five years.  Very shortly into his term, Worth was tricked by a freelance reporter posing as a solicitor into admitting that he was in fact the person who stole the Duchess, and that he was still in possession of the painting.  When he learned of his mistake, he recanted his story, but the damage had been done.  Several times the Flemish authorities offered him leniency if he would only return the artwork, but Worth refused to admit his knowledge of the Duchess at that point, even to his own lawyer. By the time he left prison in 1897, he was a broken man, ill in health, bankrupt, his wife in a mental institution, and his children being held practically at ransom by his sister-in-law in America.  He nothing left, but the Duchess.

In 1899, Worth traveled to America, and agreed to meet with William Pinkerton of the famous Pinkerton's Detective Agency.  There was probably no other organization which knew Worth's true exploits better, and, surprisingly, they had developed a certain respect for Worth, not only because of the criminal's prowess, but because he had accomplished all that he had without ever stooping to violence.  Worth too respected Pinkerton, feeling he was an honest man, and acknowledging that during his sentencing, the American agency had not come forward to add to the lies (and truths) being presented in court.  The two men became, if not unlikely friends, at least unlikely allies.  After giving Pinkerton a personal account of the crimes he had committed during his lifetime, Worth told the detective he felt, it was time for the Lady to return home.

Pinkerton made the arrangements, and, having agreed upon a price, C. Morland Agnew, son of the dealer William Agnew, traveled to America in 1901 to retrieve the painting.  Worth received $25,000 in the exchange, but he did not part with the work easily.  There are rumors that still persist that it was Worth, heavily disguised, who actually handed the Duchess over to Agnew, and that on the journey back to England, Worth, in yet another costume, sailed aboard the same ship.

Worth used the money from the sale of the painting to regain custody of his children, with whom he returned to England.  But he never recovered from his time in prison, and died shortly after his return.  The children were left with some money from their father, but surprisingly, their income was supplemented by the Pinkerton Agency, which had written an account of Worth's life and donated the proceeds of the book's sale to Worth's son and daughter.  Eventually, William Pinkerton even brought Worth's son, Henry Raymond Jr. into the employ of his company.


Irish actor Andrew Scott played Jim Moriarty in 6 episodes of the acclaimed television series Sherlock


It is likely that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle first became interested in Adam Worth when he read the account written by the freelance writer who had tricked Worth while in prison.  Though Professor Moriarty was certainly an amalgam of several figures, Doyle did confess to a friend, Dr. Gray Chandler Briggs, that the real-life criminal mastermind was the primary inspiration for Sherlock Holmes' nemesis.
So even though the real Worth is little remembered today, he is not completely forgotten due to Doyle's efforts.

As for the Duchess, she was purchased from Agnew almost immediately after he announced the recovery of the work by the American J.P. Morgan.  "What my father wanted, I want, and I must have the Duchess," declared Morgan.  Though the amount paid was not declared at the time, it was later revealed that Morgan had paid $150,000 for the painting.  After allowing the masterpiece to go on display for a short period, Morgan installed the work at the family's mansion in Knightsbridge.

In 1913, after the death of Morgan, the Duchess is sent to America, where it was handed down through his heirs until his last surviving grandchild, Mabel S. Ingalls, passed away in 1993.  At that point, the family decided to sell the painting, and on July 13, 1994, the Duchess went to auction at Sotheby's London.


Chatsworth House


At the behest of the 11th Duke of Devonshire, Thomas Gainsborough's Georgiana Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire was purchased by the Chatsworth House Trust for $408,870.  More than two centuries after its original disappearance, the painting is now finally back with her family, hanging on public display next to a 1787 portrait of Georgiana by Sir Joshua Reynolds.


Sir Joshua Reynolds
Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire



¹ Macintyre, Ben, The Napoleon of Crime:  The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Criminal, (Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, New York, 1997), p. 3.


Bibliography

Chakraborty, Deblina and Sarah Dowdey, "Who Was the Real Professor Moriarty?" transcript, Stuff You Missed in History Class Podcast, retrieved January 23, 2014 from [www.hyperlink.com/Adam-Worth-Who-Was-The-Real-Professor-Moriarty-b5AC361B7A4a21].

Doyle, Arthur Conan, "The Adventure of the Final Problem," McClure's Magazine, Volume 2, Number 1, December, 1893.

Geringer, Joseph, Adam Worth:  The World in his Pocket, Crime Library:  Criminal Minds & Methods,  retrieved January 23, 2014 from [www.trutv.com/library/crime/gangsters_outlaws/cops_others/worth/1.html].

Hinshaw, Victoria, and Kristine Hughes, Duchess of Devonshire Stolen!  Wednesday, May 26, 2010, retrieved January 23, 2014 from [www.onelondonone.blogspot.com/2010/05/duchess-of-devonshire-stolen.html].

Macintyre, Ben, The Disappearing Duchess, July 31, 1994, "The New York Times," retrieved January 23, 2014 from [www.nytimes.com/1994/07/31/magazine/the-disappearing-duchess.html?src=pm&pagewanted=1].

Macintyre, Ben, The Napoleon of Crime:  The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Criminal, (Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, New York, 1997).

Pinkerton's National Detective Agency, The Greatest Criminal of the Past Century - Stole Millions - Imprisoned but Once - Adam Worth, alias "Little Adam:" Theft and Recovery of Gainsborough's "Duchess of Devonshire," New York February 1903, retrieved January 23, 2014 from [archive.org/stream/greatestcrimina00agengoog#page/n5/mode/2up].





On View: Eric Bowman "Personal Space" Bonner David Galleries, Scottsdale, AZ

$
0
0

Eric Bowman
Note Bender
30.5 X 30.5 cm (12 X 12 in.)
oil on canvas

According to Eric Maisel, Ph.D., a renowned psychotherapist who specializes in helping creative people, artists have available to themselves two working states:  Concentration, and Absorption.  Concentration is a disciplined state which an artist must enter when they feel no inspiration, but still must push through to make themselves act nonetheless.  Absorption, on the other hand, is an unconsciously-entered trance state during which the artist becomes so involved in their work, that they become oblivious to time and their surroundings.

In his new show, "Personal Space," on view at Bonner David Galleries until February 3rd, Oregon artist Eric Bowman appears to be exploring the latter state, Absorption, through a new series of paintings.  His subjects are mainly drawn from the creative spectrum, whether they are singers, musicians, actors, dancers, bakers, or chefs, and are portrayed during that period in preparation or performance when they are lost to their own particular art.  In some of the works, famous people, such as Frank Sinatra or Stan Getz, figure, but it is still the portrayal of the creative trance that pervades the group as a whole.  Other works that seem at first to fall outside this description still focus on contemplative moments, and others, like The Marriage or What We Never Talk About, appear to be portraying a relationship affected by the dynamics of creativity - and how absorption by one partner can sometimes lead to estrangement.




"Personal Space" is now on view at Bonner David Galleries, located at 7040 East Main Street in Scottsdale, Arizona.  The gallery is ope from 10:00 am until 5:30 pm, Monday through Friday, and from 10 am until 6:00 pm on Saturdays.  It is closed on Sundays.  For more information, please contact them by phone at (480) 941-8500, or visit their website, where you can also see more paintings by the artist.

One More, Once
40.6 X 50.8 cm (16 X 20 in.)
oil on linen

Brubeck
30.5 X 30.5 cm (12 X 12 in.)
oil on panel

When Harlem Was
76.2 X 101.6 cm (30 X 40 in.)
oil on canvas

Trimmed in Blue
40.6 X 45.7 cm (16 X 18 in.)
oil on canvas

Teal Kimono
40.6 X 50.8 cm (16 X 20 in.)
oil on panel

Backstage
60.9 X 76.2 cm (24 X 30 in.)
oil on canvas

Ice Woman
40.6 X 50.8 cm (16 X 20 in.)
oil on panel

It Says Here
40.6 X 50.8 cm (16 X 20 in.)
oil on panel

Warming Up in Amber
76.2 X 101.6 cm (30 X 40 in.)
oil on canvas

Hot Pink and Olive
40.6 X 30.5 cm (16 X 12 in.)
oil on canvas



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Painting The Marriage Step-byStep


Girl Interrupted (study for The Marriage)
40.6 X 50.8 cm (16 X 20 in.)
oil on linen
In Girl Interrupted, Bowman worked out his color.


The drawing of the female figure resolved.

After gridding his drawing, Bowman transferred his image to his canvas.

Mapping out the tones using a wash of ultramarine blue and raw umber.


Using a palette that consisted of viridian green, transparent red earth, manganese blue, ultramarine blue, quinacridone red, alizarin crimson, cadmium red light, cadmium orange, cadmium yellow deep, cadmium yellow light, yellow ochre, naples yellow, and titanium white, Bowman set about blocking in the colors.



The Marriage
76.2 X 101.6 cm (30 X 40 in.)
oil on canvas

The finished piece:  near the end of the painting, Bowman decided the wrought iron chair did not quite suit the image, and he replaced it with a more solid, wooden chair.  This change was likely first worked out on his color study before he went ahead and made the significant alteration to this larger work.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



What We Never Talk About
(36 X 48 in.)
oil on canvas





In the Galleries: "Mundane to the Sublime" Haynes Galleries, Nashville, TN

$
0
0

"This exhibit is a celebration of the craft — from the mundane to the sublime. In each work, the ordinary becomes extraordinary. The unexpected becomes unexpectedly beautiful."

Kerry Dunn
Red and Green and Bull 
oil on linen
26 X 26 in. 

On view now at Haynes Galleries in Nashville, Tennessee is a new show dedicated to the still life.  Mundane to the Sublime, on view through March 8th, is a celebration of the artist's ability to see the beauty in everyday items, and how these artists can, through their skill, transform the ordinary into the the exceptional.  Over 30 artists are in the show, including gallery favorites Kerry Dunn, Victoria Novak, Nancy Depew, Cindy Procious, Philip Michelson, Michael Theise, Grace DeVito, Nicholas M. Raynolds, and Justin Wood.

“Mundane objects make beautiful paintings just as artfully designed arrangements make wonderful art," says Gary Haynes, owner of the gallery.  "This exhibit presents the exciting contrasts.”

Haynes Galleries is located in Roundabout Plaza, a landmark building at the gateway of Music Row in Nashville, Tennessee. Its hours are from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM, Tuesday through Saturday, or by prior appointment. For more information, call (615) 312-7000, or visit www.haynesgalleries.com. Owner Gary Haynes can also be reached directly, either by email, garyhaynes@haynesgalleries.com; or by phone, (615) 430-8147.

Still Life:  Mundane to the Sublime is being shown in conjunction with Nashville's annual Antiques and Garden Show held at the Nashville Music City Center.  The Antiques and Garden Show runs from February the 7th to the 9th, while the show at the Haynes Gallery runs now through the 8th.


Victoria Novak
Roma
oil on canvas
19 ¼ X 19 ¼ in.

Nancy Depew
Afterthought
oil on canvas
40 X 26 in.

Cindy Procious
Raggedy Ann
oil on panel
12 X 9 in.

Philip Michelson
Softball
acrylic on panel
24 X 20 in.

A Day with Dorian Vallejo

$
0
0

"The pursuit of excellence is life;  it makes life worth living." ~  Dorian Vallejo


Dream Ripple


This past Sunday I had the pleasure of spending an entire day with artist Dorian Vallejo in his new studio in eastern Pennsylvania.  It was a somewhat impromptu visit, the plans for which materialized mid-week after I had finally – and very tardily – responded to an email from Dorian which had sat in my inbox for far too long.  We had been meaning to get together for quite a while, and now that the opportunity to do so had arisen, a busy schedule and an encroaching storm were not going to cause me to miss that chance (again). Not only was I treated to great art conversation on philosophies and techniques, but I was also afforded the chance to see Dorian's latest work before it was packed up and shipped out to Florida for his upcoming solo show opening in just a few weeks.

I have only known Dorian personally for a few years now, but I have known of him and his work for decades.  In art school, we were near contemporaries, both studying illustration, but even though we were at different schools and only teenagers, he was already on my radar.  Each year, when the Society of Illustrators published their Annual and included winners in the rear of the book from the student competition, Dorian's work was always there.  It was on a level all its own, and seemed to be miscataloged by its inclusion in the student section, which in retrospect, it really was, since Dorian had been working professionally for half-a-decade before he even attended college.  When he left school, I continued following his career, seeking out his illustrations on book covers whenever I stepped inside a Borders or a Barnes and Noble.  Later, when he left illustration and embarked upon a successful career as a portrait painter, I followed what he was doing, and when he later challenged himself by devoting his time to fine art, I paid attention to that too.


Potentialities of Life


Dorian and I finally met a few years back at a gallery opening in SoHo, though we really had little time to talk.  Prior to that, we had several near misses, where one of us may have arrived ten minutes after the other left, or where a last minute schedule change prevented our paths from crossing.  I remember one party in particular which would have likely been the earliest event at which we could have been introduced, during which my car broke down on Canal Street while en route, and after several hours of tinkering in the rain, I finally got the car started, and grumpy and wet, I turned and headed home instead of attending the celebration.  A friend who was there told me he had met Dorian, whom he described as a giant, hulking figure in a leather jacket and muddy motorcycle boots who tromped into the get-together and fairly held the place hostage, and I thought perhaps I had been lucky to have been spared that encounter.

Those of you who already know Dorian will see nothing of him in that description of course.  It was most likely a case of mistaken identity, though I have never been able to puzzle out who in reality my other friend encountered.  Dorian, in actuality, is a man of slightly-above average height, with a slim athletic build; a polite, gregarious, and yet direct manner; and dark, piercing eyes, much like those in a Velásquez portrait.  


Dorian Vallejo prepping some paintings for transport.


But if there is one aspect to Dorian which I imagine parallels with those of that mysterious party-going ruffian whom I thankfully never met, it is this:  Dorian can be intimidating – not in some violent or aggressive way, but in the way he challenges himself to be the best he possibly can be, and in the way he invites everyone he encounters to do the same.  He draws and paints from life relentlessly to make himself a better artist;  he eats healthily and exercises regularly to make himself a better artist;  he studies and researches daily to make himself a better artist;  he sets and overcomes obstacles continuously in order to make himself a better artist.  And truthfully, such a pursuit of excellence can be intimidating, especially when in comparison you might find yourself unwilling or lacking the ability to attack life with the same intensity.  But it can also be encouraging, as his classmates, friends, and students can attest, and it can also be very exciting, as those of us who wait to see what that pursuit of excellence will produce can attest to as well.


Study of Fatima


Dorian Vallejo's new show A Dream within a Dream opens March 1st at Sirona Fine Art Gallery in Hallandale Beach, Florida.  It features a dozen-and-a-half new, grand-scale paintings, and nearly three dozen new drawings.  For more information, please visit the Sirona Fine Art website, or contact the gallery at 954.454.9494.


Blossom



Artistes Pompiers

$
0
0

Jacques-Louis David
Oath of the Horatii (1786)
oil on canvas
51.26 X 65.63 in.

During the nineteenth century, a peculiar pejorative was coined to describe French artists working in the Neo-Classical style.  Among detractors, these artists became known as the "artistes pompiers," a term which literally translates as "firemen artists." Though today's audience might not immediately grasp the joke, citizens of nineteenth century Paris would have been able to understand the correlation quite easily, and to see the derision in the comment immediately.


A helmet worn by the sapeurs-pompiers, circa 1830, from the site Betrand Malvaux Antiquaire Expert


The uniform of the Sapeurs-Pompiers


The term "artistes pompiers" was a joke that existed on several levels.  Firstly, it had a visual component.  It was a comparison between the Greco-Roman helmets which featured so prominently in Neo-Classical painting, with the ornate helmets of Paris' newly formed fire department.  And secondly, it was a play on words, poking fun at the similarity between the words "pompier" (from the 15th c. Middle Dutch word pompe, a "water conduit pipe"¹), "pompe" (French for "a stately or splendid procession"), "Pompéin" (French for "from Pompeii), and "pompeux" ("pompous").  It is likely that the pun-like reference between "pompier" and "pompeux" began with comments aimed at the firemen themselves (the sapeur-pompier), who, as a division of Napoleon's Corps of Engineers, were bedecked in some of the most elaborate military uniforms ever witnessed, and who would have made quite a spectacle in the streets of Paris when they were installed in 1810.  It was not until the 1830s that the combination "artistes pompiers" fell into common usage.


Charles-Édouard Chaise
Theseus Victor of the Minotaur (c. 1791)
oil on canvas


Though the insult was first directed at Neo-Classical artists, "artistes pompiers" was a slight that was at its heart always aimed at the French Academies, and in time, came to refer to any artist trained in the "academic tradition." It was considered that the art these academies produced was "without originality, either of conception or execution . . . (containing) well-worn subjects and hackneyed modes of expression, whose style was over-empahtic and pretentious."²  Eventually, the Neo-Classicists, the Romantics, the Realists, the Naturalists, the Orientalists, the Barbizon School, the Symbolists, and, to a lesser extent, the Impressionists, all fell under the umbrella of "l'art pompier;" and in art criticism, the term "artistes pompiers" gained in popularity, reaching its apex of usage sometime in the 1940s (though it still sometimes appears today).


Sir Nathaniel Dance-Holland
The Meeting of Dido and Aeneas
oil on canvas
49 X 68.5 in.


The reasons why the Academies were so derided are numerous and complex, and ofttimes contradictory.  There was probably no period in art that was more widely and enthusiastically admired that that of the nineteenth century academies³, and certainly, it was a period when many collectors were willing to pay vast sums to obtain the works of contemporary artists.  However, there were issues of class (art had been the province of the royalty, but by the 19th century, was in the hands of the nouveau rich), politics (the Academies, and the annual competitions where artists could secure a lifelong fortune, were state-run and reactionary), and a genuine concern of markets being inundated with similar-looking  works of art (the Academies with their specific proscriptions of technique and their over-fondness for making copies, only tightened their focus during the popular historicism movement generated by archeological discoveries in Greece, Italy, and Egypt), that brought a certain level of dissatisfaction with the Academic system.


Angélique Mongez
Mars and Venus
oil on canvas


Why the pejorative "artistes pompiers" has survived so long is a puzzle that is inextricable from the mystery as to why so-called "Academic" art still garners so much animosity to the present day.  What makes this hatred so odd is that "academic" is a plastic term, which, when applied to art, changed according to those in power at the highest levels of education;  this is why so many members of the avant-garde eventually became associated with "l'art pompier"– as proponents of new art forms came to power, they just became part of the machine against which they originally rebelled.  Why did such feeling not extend to the Moderns when they assumed leadership?  And why is it that other nineteenth century artists working in disciplines other than the visual arts, who were attacked for similar weaknesses, have never been dismissed outright as have been the painters and sculptors?⁴  

Hopefully the renewed interest in nineteenth century art that began to take hold in the late twentieth century will, if not fully restore the artists of that period to their former glory, at least re-establish their importance to the art which followed them.




¹ "Pump," Online Etymology Dictionary, retrieved February 10, 2014 from {www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=pump&allowed_in_frame=0}.
² "pompier", Dictionnaire Larousse:
Pompier:  Adjective applied to artists working in the Neo-Classical style without originality, either of conception or execution.  The term is an allusion to helmets, closely resembling those worn by the firemen of the period, which feature as part of the costume in so many of the pictures.  By extension the term came to be applied to all artists working in the academic tradition, using well-worn subjects and hackneyed modes of expression, whose style was over-emphatic and pretentious.
³ Harding, James, Artistes Pompiers, (Rizzoli International Publications, Inc., New York, 1979), p. 7.
⁴ In his essay, "Fear and Loathing of the Academic, or Just What is it that Makes the Avant-Garde so Different, so Appealing?" (Art and the Academy in the Nineteenth Century, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 2000), Paul Barlow makes a convincing argument that the academic painter Frederic Lord Leighton has been treated much more harshly than his contemporary, the poet Alfred Lord Tennyson.  Though both men were similarly admired and honored in the lifetimes, and both were disparaged by the Modernists who followed them, only Leighton was nearly expunged from the Encyclopaedia Britannica.  In 1970, the entry on Leighton was very short and dismissive, and included only one painting, whereas Tennyson was afforded an extensive entry, which included both the positives and negatives in his work.  As time has gone on, and we have become more removed from the rebellion against Victorian culture, the reviews of Tennyson in the Encyclopaedia Britannica have only become more positive, while Leighton's entry has remained remarkably unchanged through the 1986 and 1997 editions.



Workshop Notes: Painting Best Practices

$
0
0

This past autumn, I had the privilege of attending a two-day workshop in northern New Jersey (within sight of the George Washington Bridge in the now infamous town of Fort Lee no less) which dealt with the subject of longevity in paintings.  Titled, "Painting Best Practices," the class was taught by artist materials expert George O'Hanlon, and it was one of several he offered on the topic at different venues throughout North America near the end of 2013.


George O'Hanlon

O'Hanlon, for those unfamiliar with him, is an accomplished gentleman who has worked tirelessly on behalf of the arts.  He is the Executive Director of Iconofile, an in-depth, online database of traditional Christian iconography which catalogs not only the images in these paintings, sculptures, and pieces of fiber art, but also their histories and the techniques behind making them;  a contributing member of AMIEN, the Art Materials Information and Education Network, which was founded by the late Mark David Gottsegen, an internationally-esteemed authority on art supplies; and he is also a member of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), who has, in his capacity on the committee for Artists' Paints and Related Materials, lobbied for such causes as universal paintbrush sizes, and against such ideas as those which call for uniform particle size across all pigments, a move which he considers could be detrimental to the enduring beauty of artists' colors.

For those of you who do know O'Hanlon, he is also, of course, founder and president of the art supply company, Natural Pigments, an achievement which, as odd as it may seem, I intentionally overlooked in the previous paragraph.  Why?  Because, surprisingly, O'Hanlon's relationship with Natural Pigments had very little to do with this workshop.

What could have easily been a two-day sales presentation - which would not necessarily have been unwelcome to the participants - simply was not.  O'Hanlon did not even bring any of his company's products along to sell, and when asked why he had not, the expression on his face indicated that the thought had never crossed his mind.  But this honest omission on his part is rather revealing :  it shows the integrity of George O'Hanlon and his wife Tatiana Zaytseva.  They hosted this workshop to teach painters how best to increase the longevity of their paintings, not to promote themselves. This is not to say that Natural Pigments' products were never discussed;  the goal of Natural Pigments is to make the best available materials possible, and of course O'Hanlon knows his own product line well, so Natural Pigments' items were certainly mentioned.  But if a competitor makes a good product, O'Hanlon will not hesitate to say so; he never disparages another company, and he regularly recommends other people's products.  He is simply less concerned that artists buy his products, than he is that they buy the right products.

George O'Hanlon just honestly loves art, and he wants all artists to be able to make the best paintings they possibly can.

From the moment O'Hanlon began his presentation, I was taking notes.  By the end of the first sentence, however, I already felt I had fallen behind;  there was nothing extraneous in his delivery, and no down time between interesting topics to allow me to catch up with my record.  Everything he imparted was informative and useful.  Of course, it helped that O'Hanlon had geared this particular presentation toward oil painters, as most of us there worked in that medium;  perhaps if he had been speaking more about a medium other than my preferred one, I may have found some moments to let my pen rest, but I doubt it.


Tatiana Zaytseva demonstrating the different ratios of linseed oil to pigment relative to color.


With so much information to offer, the question has of course arisen, "Why doesn't O'Hanlon write a book, or make a set of DVDs on the topic, rather than do these workshops?" It is not that O'Hanlon is adverse to the idea, but he realizes that there is a limitation to either of those pathways, namely that the pace at which new discoveries are made in the fields of paint durability and conservation, far outstrips the speed at which proper books or DVDs on the topics can be produced.  (This was a problem that O'Hanlon witnessed with his friend, Mark Gottsegen, who wanted to annually update his excellent reference guide, The Painter's Handbook, but who was met with resistance by the publisher, who, justifiably, could not put out revised editions so often).

It is for these reasons that I highly recommend O'Hanlon's workshops, and if you have the opportunity to attend one, I encourage you to do so.  I warn you that it may at times get heady, but if you are someone like me – and it is likely you are – who puts a lot of time in your work, and hopes that it will last for generations, this is information that could be of the utmost importance to the success and satisfaction you gain during your career as an artist.

O'Hanlon has six Best Practices workshops scheduled for this winter.  The first is in Portland, Oregon later this month, with three taking place in March – in Springville, Utah;  Palo Alto, California; and New York, New York;  and two in June;  in Alstead, New Hampshire and San Diego, California. Most of these have been extended to three day events, which is ideal, but you really cannot go wrong either way.

I do hope that George and Tatiana bring some of their Natural Pigments product line with them for this round of workshops, however, as having the opportunity to see the quality of their paints and other supplies in person is the best convincing you could ever have to try them out.  Currently, Natural Pigments is only available for purchase through the company itself, or through a few hand-picked outlets throughout North America.  Natural Pigments has been approached by larger retailers seeking to carry their goods, but George and Tatiana have so far preferred to keep their items in arenas where the sellers have product-specific knowledge and are more available to answer consumer questions directly.  And yes, this means on top of everything else George does, he makes himself as available as possible to personally answer customer questions via the telephone or through email if you are buying from him.

Yes, he really is that kind of business owner, and yes, Natural Pigments really is that kind of company.

For more information on the upcoming Painting Best Practices workshops, including locations, tuition, and registration, please consult the following links:


More information can also be gained by calling Natural Pigments at 1.888.361.5900.

--------------------------------------------------

I have decided, with O'Hanlon's blessing, to post some of notes from the workshop here on the blog. Not all of my notes will be included, however, and I plan to focus only on the first day of the workshop in this present post (I may include notes from the second day in a future post if there is enough interest).  Even so, what I will include below does not represent all of my notes from that initial day, as there are several items I came across while reviewing my records, of which I can now make neither heads nor tails (I certainly could benefit from enrolling in the workshop a second time!). I imagine that many of these same topics will be covered in-depth again during the upcoming seminars, but even were all of my notes from both days reproduced here, I am certain that it would not represent the entirety of O'Hanlon's program.  In addition to whatever I have missed, O'Hanlon will no doubt include any new discoveries made since last September in his upcoming presentations, and it is likely that he will be able to include more information in general during his longer, three-day workshops.  Plus, it must also be taken into account that the workshops are participant-driven, with O'Hanlon answering questions from previously submitted emails, and on the spot.  (During the two-day workshop I attended, O'Hanlon was only derailed by one question, which had to do with the possibility of wax migration from a protective, finishing layer, down through paint layers to the ground;  though O'Hanlon stated that wax added to paint as an extender will freely migrate through all paint layers, he was unable to commit to the certainty of wax from a sealing coat penetrating all the way to the support.  It was something he wanted to research more before answering).


  • Painters are the only artists who don't work with raw materials (egg tempera is the exception)
  • Three types of painting failures are :  Mechanical, Chemical, and Biological (mold, fungi, insects, etc.)
  • Paintings are a composite system - the paint affects the support, and vice versa.
  • Paint films act differently depending on the support - Flexible vs. Rigid.
  • Like building a house - the structure may be sound, but if the foundation is weak, it can still collapse.
  • Different colors expand and contract at different rates.  This can lead to cracking in the paint film.
  • Blisters are the result of poor adhesion or the loss of elasticity.
  • The paint layer actually supports the canvas!
  • Rigid supports prevent many problems.
  • A sound support copes with handling and transport; has a low response to Relative Humidity and temperature; is chemically stable; and is visually acceptable.
  • Solid Wood Supports are extremely hygroscopic;  their mechanical response to temperature and humidity is orthotropic.
  • Hygroscopic - the ability to attract and hold water 
  • Orthotropic - responds in different directions.  In the case of wood, in changes according to where it was cut:  radial, longitudinal, and tangential.
  • Wood supports have little longitudinal change respective of Relative Humidity or temperature, and only slightly more change in terms of radial movement.  Tangential movement, however, is significant in correlation to changes in humidity or temperature.
  • Paint should move in the same way as the support.
  • Over time, wood deforms;  cells wear out.
  • Wood panels should be air-dried for many years.
  • In the Renaissance, panels were chosen with the understanding that they would warp outward (in the direction of the wood rings).
  • Joined panels which formed an undulating S-curve were better (in an alternating fashion, convex and concave panels joined together to form a support that had a "wavy" surface.  The tension of the panels curving in opposite directions kept the support relatively "flat").
  • Plywood is made of an odd number of wood layers, with each layer placed at a right angle (relative to wood grain) to the previous layer.
  • Plywood Pros:  excellent strength, stiffness, and resistance to creep;  less dense than fiberboard;  birch plywood has excellent hardness
  • Plywood cons:  anisotropic (directionally dependent, i.e. it is easier to split with the grain than against it);  contains urea-formaldehyde resins;  absorbant;  veneer prone to "checking" (thin, long, and relatively straight cracks in the paint film usually in the direction of the grain)
  • Fiberboard (high density and medium density bound with a synthetic glue) Pros:  isotropic (uniform in all direction, i.e. no grain);  deforms less than solid wood in high humidity;  excellent strength and hardness.
  • Fiberboard Cons:  contains urea-formaldehyde resins;  denser than plywood;  subject to physical damage;  fibers raise when wetted.
  • Hardboard (Masonite®) - steam pressed and bound with lignin, a natural glue polymer - is rare
  • Hardboard Pros:  isotropic, deforms less than solid wood in high humidity; excellent strength and hardness.
  • Hardboard Cons:  denser than plywood;  subject to physical damage;  fibers raise when wetted (but less so than fiber board).
  • Tempered Hardboard (oil coated) is less hydroscopic.
  • Tempered Hardboard was formerly made using linseed oil.  Now soybean oil is used.
  • Panel Grades:  (A) no surface knots;  (B) knots have been filled in;  (C) open knots
  • Flat Cradling (used for bracing wood panels) is the oldest form of cradling
  • Flat Cradling systems from the second half of the 18th c. consist of glued vertical strips of wood, and sliding horizontal strips  (if both directions were glued, the cradling could damage the panels when it reacted to humidity and temperature differently than the panel)
  • Raised Cradling (19th c.) had deeper recesses and required less gluing.
  • Button Cradling consists of many small pieces of wood glued to the back of the panel with slots allowing for sliding horizontal strips.
  • The less that is glued to the back of panel when cradling, the better.
  • A painting is a system - once something is added (canvas, paint, cradle, etc.), it acts as part of that system.
  • Attributes of the Ideal Adhesive:  minimum negative aging characteristics (it doesn't yellow, become brittle, etc.);  sets without generating stresses;  resistant to climatic influences (not hydroscopic);  resistant to microorganisms;  possible to use cold;  is no more rigid than the panel (it must have some flexibility).
  • Types of Adhesives:  glutoline and collagen glues (hide glue);  casein glues;  artificial resin adhesives
  • Rabbitskin Glue in the USA is made from pork and beef (by-products of the meat industry).  Its name refers to strength only, not its source material.
  • Isinglass glue is made from the dried bladders of Russian sturgeon - it is used by conservators to correct delamination.
  • Fish glue has good strength and remains liquid at room temperature.
  • Collagen glue is made from animal bones, cartilage, and hooves (and less frequently, animal hides).
  • In the USA, glue has a deodorizing agent added;  European glue smells like road kill.
  • Casein glue is a skim milk derivative.  It is good at filling pores and it is less hydroscopic than collagen glues.  Casein glue hydrolyzed with lime is best version.
  • PVA glue (polyvinyl acetate) is a better glue, though under certain circumstances it can release acetic acid.
  • Lineco makes a good PVA glue.
  • Talas Aquazol (another brand of adhesive) is hydroscopic.
  • Acrylic gels when used as adhesives suffer from not being easily reversible during conservation.
  • Protective Backings are important!
  • Earliest form of protective backing was to paint on both sides of a panel.
  • Moisture can't go through pigment!
  • Backings slow down the moisture cycle.
  • Direct Backing Types:  pigmented shellac, fused beeswax, fused beeswax and shellac, metal and plastic foils.
  • Indirect Backing Types:  plywood boards, fiberboards, composites.
  • Gesso does not make for a good direct backing - it is hydroscopic.
  • Polyurethane might not make for a good direct backing.
  • Zinsser makes a pigmented shellac.
  • Plastic Supports - Pros:  rigid, lightweight, low moisture absorption
  • Plastic Supports - Cons:  low to moderate thermal expansion (paint and panel should move the same), susceptible to UV damage.
  • ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) plastic is pretty good.
  • Sintra® PVC - closed cell polyvinyl chloride foam board.
  • Plastics have low-energy surfaces, i.e. it is hard to adhere to them.
  •  Aluminum Composite Material (ACM) or Aluminum Composite Panels (ACP) are the standard names for the material most artists refer to as Dibond®
  • ACM Pros - excellent strength;  lightweight; easy to fabricate;  not hydroscopic;  expands and contracts at nearly the same rate as paint.
  • ACM Cons -  expensive;  not as readily available as other materials.
  • ACM can be cut with a plexiglass blade.
  • Paint on the coated side of the ACM.  Scuff it first, then wipe it clean with isopropyl alcohol.  Do not sand down to the aluminum.
  • Beva® makes an adhesive available in sheet form (#371), which can be used to fasten canvas or linen to an ACM panel.  It dissolves in toluene.
  • Honeycomb aluminum panels are an excellent painting support.  They are lightweight, have excellent strength, and do not warp.  However, they are difficult to fabricate and very  expensive.
  • Copper Panel Pros - does not warp, excellent strength, lightweight
  • Copper Panel Cons - expensive, difficult to fabricate.  Can also suffer from oil-canning (moderate buckling).
  • Some of the best preserved paintings were done centuries ago on copper panels.
  • Linen vs. Cotton - Linen:  2-3 times stronger than cotton;  absorbs more moisture and dries quickly;  relatively more expensive;  Cotton:  weaker than linen; absorbs moisture and dries quickly;  low cost;  readily available.
  • 19th c. linen was stronger than today's linen.  It had longer fibers.
  • Looser weave linen (non-mechanically woven, perhaps) is better for painting.
  • Artificial textiles have high strength and stiffness and a low moisture response.
  • 9.1 oz Clipper and Fredrix® Polyflax 1008 are good polyester fabrics for artist use.
  • O'Hanlon doesn't recommend flexible supports at all.
  • The stretcher key was introduced in the mid 18th c..
  • Sapwood stretchers are too absorbent.
  • Cross members should be introduced one for every 30" of stretcher length.  They should be made of a different wood from the stretcher bars.
  • Low lips on stretchers create a microclimate between the bars and the canvas back, which can lead to problems.
  • John Annesley Company in California makes expansion bolt stretchers for precise tension control.
  • Switching from stretched canvas to a rigid panel will remove 90% of future problems.
  • On a macro level, there is little difference between staples and canvas tacks.
  • A tack has the same surface area under the head as a staple area.
  • When attaching canvas to the stretcher bars, place a strip of mylar between the staple and the canvas.  This increases the surface area affected by the staple, and makes removing the staples at a later date easier.  Make sure to use low-profile staples.
  • Copper coated tacks are good for attaching canvas to the stretcher.
  • Staple the canvas on the back of the stretchers.  This broadens the stress point placed on the canvas across the edges.
  • Place staples parallel to the edge, 1" to 1½ " apart at most.  More staples distribute the stress on the canvas.
  • Fold the fabric at the stretcher corners using "hospital corners" - this reduces the point of stress.
  • It's good to have a humidity and temperature gauge in your studio.
  • The optimum temperature for stretching a canvas is between 64 - 74˚.
  • Stretch your canvas in a moderate environment.  Calculate your margins, align the stretcher to the weave, draw weave lines, line up and set corners, and STRETCH FROM THE CORNERS using pliers.
  • Conservators now feel that stretching canvases beginning in the corners and moving toward the center of each side is better than starting in the middle and moving out toward the corners.
  • Variations in canvas tension can lead to cracking in the sizing, ground, paint, and varnish layers.  Uneven stresses placed at the corners create radiating cracks, commonly seen in 19th c. paintings.
  • When stretching a canvas, set the sides with push pins along the edge first, before tacking or stapling on the back.  Tension is then placed over a short distance - from the push pin to the staple or tack.
  • Pre-stretching an unprimed canvas (setting the fibers in place) -  Stretch by hand;  wet with a fine mist first;  then wet thoroughly;  let it dry completely.
  • Never leave your paintings in a hot car!
  • A backing for a stretched canvas acts as buffer from environmental changes, protects against mechanical damage, and keeps out dirt and debris.
  • A good backing can be made from hardboard.  Attach hardboard to stretcher backs using screws and washers.  Make sure the screw holes in the hardboard are large enough to accommodate movement in the hardboard (expansion and contraction) created by environmental changes.
  • A backing with holes in it (some people erroneously believe this allows the canvas to "breathe") creates its own environmental climate, different from that affecting the rest of the painting.
  • There is nothing permanent in art materials!  We can use "longevity" and "durability" when discussing art materials, but not "archival."
  • We should all paint frescoes!  They are the most durable paintings.
  • Have a healthy distrust for commercial art products.  They are marketed to hobbyists, so longevity is not the issue, price is.
  • Most canvases must be relined after 100 years.
  • Light and oxidation are the greatest threats to all painting materials.
  • 15th c. paintings are in better condition than 17th c. paintings, which are, in turn, in better condition than 19th c. paintings.
  • Types of sizing:  animal collagen glue, PVA, or acrylic dispersion.
  • Size is considered part of the ground.  On stretched canvas, it is used to stiffen the fabric, and not necessarily for creating a barrier between the support and the paint.  On wood panels, size provides a barrier and creates a uniform painting surface.  Size is unnecessary on metal or plastic.
  • Grounds act as a barrier between the support and the paint layer, provide a receptive surface for the paint, and present a suitable background for the paint.
  • Types of grounds include traditional gesso or chalk;  oil or alkyd; and acrylic dispersion (e.g.  what many companies confusingly call "acrylic gesso")
  • Gesso is the Italian word for gypsum (calcium sulfate).  Whether you used the word "gesso" or the word "gypsum" depended on which side of the Alps you were from.
  • Up until the late Renaissance, gesso (calcium sulfate) was primarily used for grounds in Italy, while Northern Europe used chalk (calcium carbonate).
  • In making gesso (gypsum + animal collagen glue), the glue quantity should be low, without under-binding.  Ideally, gesso should be 81.6% calcium sulfate by volume in relation to the glue.
  • To cut the porosity of a chalk ground, coat it with oil or shellac.
  • Lead oil grounds suffer little free-swelling strain.
  • Hide glue has great stiffness, but weakens at high humidity.
  • Contrary to common belief, acrylic does respond to moisture.
  • The "yield point" is the specific point after which a stretched material can no longer return to its original state. (stress/strain)
  • The yield point of paints is lower than the flex rate of canvas.
  • Zinc white is very rigid, but breaks quickly.
  • The breaking point of paint occurs when elongation can no longer occur under applied stress, and the material separates.
  • Titanium white is less rigid, but also has a poor breaking point.
  • According to the Proposition 65 Awareness Act in California, titanium dioxide (when airborne) is a possible carcinogen.
  • In food, titanium dioxide is basically inert.
  • Oil paint on an acrylic ground has good adhesion, and is very stable.
  • Acrylic grounds improve the flexibility of oil paint, especially alkyds.
  • Adhesion - when 2 things cling together.
  • Cohesion - when one thing clings to itself.
  • Mechanisms of adhesion:  mechanical, chemical (weak form of bonding), dispersive (Van der Waals forces), electrostatic, diffusive.
  • Metal surfaces have micro fissures (mechanical adhesion)
  • Acrylics cure over a longer period of time than previously thought.
  • Acrylic-primed canvas is better than today's oil-primed canvas, only because lead paint is no longer used (unless specified).  Titanium and zinc used in grounds are far too brittle.
  • The art market is reliant on all other industries.  "We're the step-child."






Transferring Drawings

$
0
0

Recently, I was asked about the method I use to transfer my drawings to the canvas.  The only response to this question of procedure I can honestly answer is that, when it comes to transferring my ideas to their final support, I am consistently inconsistent.  That is to say, I have no particular method that I use all of the time.  Rather, I will alter my approach depending the size of the sketch and/or the finished work, whether the finished painting will be executed using indirect or direct painting methods, whether or not the drawing will stand on its own as a work of art, the key of the painting, time constraints, and, frankly, a little bit of whim.

The earliest manner of transferring images I ever learned was tracing, which was introduced to me when I was around five or six years old.  I used the "Poor Man's Lightbox" method then, placing a page from one of my coloring books on the sliding glass door to our backyard patio, and laying on top of this a plain piece of 8 ½ X 11 typewriter paper.  With the pieces of paper made translucent by the sunlight passing through them from behind, it was easy to follow the contours of the printed line-drawing with a graphite pencil and make a decent duplicate on the top sheet.  It worked well enough because of the lightweight paper being used, but, unfortunately, such a process cannot work with an opaque material, such as canvas.  Nevertheless, it was an important youthful lesson, as nearly every method of transferring I use now involves tracing of some sort, either from the original to a piece of transparent or translucent material, or on the original itself.

Since I normally do not work very large, I usually make my drawings the same size as my finished works, which makes transfers very easy.  The most direct manner of transferring a drawing involves coating the entire backside of the original with graphite or charcoal, placing it image-side up on the final working surface, and using a stylus or writing implement to re-outline the original drawing.  If the right amount of pressure is used, the charcoal or graphite outline will be transcribed to the canvas or panel, resulting in a good copy on which to paint.  If for some reason I do not want to coat the back of my original with graphite or charcoal, I can always make a transfer sheet by coating a thin piece of paper (e.g. tracing paper) with the graphite or charcoal, and placing this between my drawing and the work surface before re-outlining my image.  The result is the same, though the use of the transfer sheet may require slightly more pressure to make a good transfer.  Once the drawing has been conveyed to the final surface, I will usually affix it with a sealant (e.g. spray shellac), or I will re-outline the drawing using thinned oil paint, and a fine "pencil" (a pointed, round brush).  If the latter method is used, excess charcoal or graphite should be removed once the lines are dry, using a chamois or kneaded eraser.  Either way, when the drawing is ready to paint over, there will not be much loose graphite or charcoal left to mix with my paints and dirty the colors.  I do not recommend using pre-made, commercial graphite transfer paper for this work, however, as the few times I have tried it were quite disappointing.  Whatever binder is used to seal the graphite to the commercial paper is rather waxy, and the lines which are transferred to the work surface tend to repel thinned paint and cause it to bead.


Transferring a drawing using tracing paper.  Artwork by Dorian Iten.  (register for classes with Iten at The Art Department)


A similar method to what I just described involves the "lightbox procedure" I mentioned earlier.  It is like using transfer paper, but in reverse.  I place my drawing image-side down on a lightbox (or against a window), and trace my drawing on the back of the original.  I can then place this on my work surface, image-side up, and go over my original drawing again with a stylus, ballpoint pen, 2H pencil, etc., to create enough pressure to transfer the drawing.  Of course, since the drawing has already been traced quite accurately on the back, I do not have to be very careful with how I apply pressure to the frontside;  even forceful scrubbing will work.  

Without a lightbox, this process can also be done with tracing paper.  After laying the tracing paper on the original, and outlining the drawing, flip the tracing paper over, and re-do the lines on the reverse.  Place it right-side up on the canvas or panel, and using pressure, the drawing can be transferred to the final support.

I actually prefer these latter two methods (what I am calling the "lightbox" method), to the usual charcoal/graphite transfer method, because I feel that it is easier in these ways to preserve the character of my original linework.  The former methods of transfer tend to produce a line on the work surface that is a bit too uniform and lifeless for my tastes.


This old Artograph DB400 that was auctioned off by Salt Lake Community College in 2013.  The winning bid was only $25!


When I worked as an illustrator, and time constraints were always an issue, I sometimes found myself turning to other methods for transcribing my sketches.  Frequently I used an opaque projector to cast my image on the final surface, and trace its outlines in the darkness of my studio.  In this manner I was able to preserve my line character better, and if I needed to, I could also enlarge or shrink my original to suit the needs of my finish.  This method also enabled me to do separate drawings of different elements in my work, and project them and trace them at different sizes to create the right montage on my final support;   I did not have to first complete a single drawing with all of the elements in their correct places before rushing into my finish.  At the time, I was using an old workhorse of a machine, the Artograph DB400, which, as nice as it was for its time, did have some drawbacks.  Firstly, the original sketches to be projected could not be larger than 10 ½ X 10 ½ inches, otherwise they could not fit inside the machine;  this often led to me cutting up my drawings into sections and projecting and tracing the parts piecemeal.  Secondly, the design of the machine, with a heavy projection unit cantilevered over my drawing table, caused the head of the machine to dip closer to my work surface than its rear did, thereby distorting the image.  Try as I might to level the head with shims, I was never able to get the projection completely square.  Eventually, my frustration over the distortion caused me to retire the DB400 early and move on to other methods and tools.  Today, there are digital projection units, including some made by Artograph, which are likely a much better alternative to opaque projectors.


Donato Giancola using a brayer to level a drawing he has adhered to a panel.


The option I turned to after shelving my projector was what I came to refer to as the "Donato Method," so-called after the illustrator Donato Giancola, who introduced me to the idea.  Early in his career, Donato had devised a time-saving shortcut for transferring his drawings to panels – he simply photocopied his originals, and glued them to a sheet of hardboard or plywood, and painted on top of this.  I personally cannot vouch for the durability of this technique, but I can say that he made every attempt at promoting the longevity of his works.  He would use acid free paper that he would buy from an art supplier, and put that in the photocopiers at businesses which offered blueprinting services or large-format copiers, and adhere the paper to panels using acrylic gel medium.  My guess is that the most vulnerable part of his method is the copied image itself, which, if it did happen to fade, would likely have no lasting impact on the finished work, and may actually be a desirable side-effect of the process.  I used the "Donato Method" for many years, and I have to say it does offer many benefits.  It is quick, it preserves the character and charm of the original drawing, and it preserves the original drawing itself, which, if by any chance something goes terribly wrong, can be copied again.  By retaining the original sketch, you also have another piece of artwork to sell if here is a market for your drawings.  (My description of Donato's method is perhaps over-simplified.  To read more about the technique, visit Donato's website, where he describes his process in more detail).


At this stage in one of my paintings, I have established the values of my finished work.
The dark, thin linework, like that seen forming the contours of the trees in the background,
were done through an oil paint transfer sheet.


Several years ago, after reading Mark Walker's article "Bouguereau at Work" (available online at the Art Renewal Center), I switched to a method which Bouguereau favored, and which was apparently popular in France in the late 19th century.  Basically, this particular process for transferring drawings is much like the method of using transfer paper I described earlier, except instead of using a sheet of paper covered with charcoal or graphite, a transfer sheet of oil paint is employed.  This technique, as recorded by the artist Jehan Georges Vibert in his book The Science of Painting is described as follows:

. . . instead of using paper rubbed with black or red chalk, or white lead or lamp black, the tracings on which have the disadvantage of disappearing as the painting proceeds and sometimes soiling the tones, it is preferable to prepare a tracing paper of the shade desired by rubbing oil colour mixed with siccative on an ordinary piece of tracing paper.  In order that very little colour may remain, any excess should be well wiped off with a rag pad. 
The layer of colour being very thin and very siccative, this kind of paper is only serviceable for a few hours. 
Its use has great advantages :  the tracings obtained from it when dry look as if painted with a very fine paint brush ;  they do not run when painted with new colour – they may even be done over with semi-liquids or glazings ;  and they bring no foreign body into the painting.  For designs on stuffs, tapestries or other ornaments which have to be traced on backgrounds, and which require going over, this kind of tracing is very convenient, because by doing it with the exact tone, there is no need to repaint the tracing.

Personally, I like this method a lot, and for precisely the reasons Vibert suggested.  I particularly like the fact that, by not introducing a new material to my paintings, these painted outlines are not going to damage the longevity of my work.  When I have employed this method, I have used raw umber oil paint spread on tracing paper using a paper towel.  I do not add any medium, and the lines dry to the touch within half a day.  The one negative to this, however, is that the paint transfers very easily to canvas, and can leave the light remains of pigment on the crests of the weave, so I tend to clean up the transfer with a dry brush before allowing it to set.


A transfer done using a homemade pastel sheet.


Recently, I have been utilizing another variation on the basic transfer method, using sheets made with pastels instead of charcoal or graphite.  I choose the color of the pastel based on the key of my painting, and by what color I think will least affect the overall painting in the future, when my paints become more transparent.  And if I see a need to, I can use more than one color of pastel without making too much of a mess.  So, for example, if I am working on a high contrast piece with light-colored flowers, I might use a dark value pastel in the shadow areas, and a light value that suits the local color of the flower petals.  Once the transfer has been made, I clean up the image, if necessary, with a kneaded eraser, and seal the pastel with shellac and an atomizer.  This method produces colored lines which are just as clean as those made with the oil paint transfer sheets, but has the advantage of a shorter drying period;  the shellac is dry within minutes, and allows moving on to the finish on the same day.

Of course, another option is just to re-draw the sketch directly on the work surface, which I have also done many times before.  One method is to use gridding, by which the original can be superimposed with a framework of squares – drawn directly on the original or overlaid on a piece of clear acetate – and transferred to a corresponding framework of squares on the canvas (see Enlarging a Drawing & Squaring Off).  But perhaps my favorite, at least in terms of the outcome, has been to place my original alongside my work surface and using sight-size to redraw my original concept on the canvas directly in thinned oil paint.







Random Inspiration: Emma Meyer

$
0
0

Emma Meyer
Women Decorating Porcelain at De Kgl. Porcelænsfabrik (Royal Copenhagen), 1895
oil on canvas
58 X 80 cm. (22.8 X 31.5 in.)


Painter Emma Eleonore Meyer is little known in the United States, and it is a shame.  In terms of staying power in the cultural consciousness, she unfortunately had several impediments to her being remembered :  she worked in a period and style that became much maligned, even in her own lifetime;  she was not associated with a 19th century powerhouse country like England, the United States, or France;  and she was a woman – a single woman – with no famous male artist spouse or relative to lend her fame through association.  And even when one stumbles across her today, in this age of too much information, she is difficult to research, even in her progressive home country of Denmark, where she is considered an important painter.

Emma Meyer was born August 20th, 1859 in Flensburg, a major port city on the Danish-German border.  She was the third child of Maria Frederikke Dalberg (1832-1917), and Fritz Meyer (1871-1891), a Member of the Court of Appeals who later became a Supreme Court Justice.  At a time when women could not study at the free Danish Art Academy, and when even schools formed by large women's rights groups only taught their students crafting skills like painting porcelain, designing textile patterns, or engraving the work of other artists in copperplate, Meyer had the good fortune to study with some of the most influential artists in her country.  Among her teachers were Emilie Mundt and Marie Luplau, a feminist couple who trained in Munich and Paris and who had opened a school in Coppenhagen that catered to female students;  Harald Foss, a well-known landscape painter;  and Peder Severin Krøyer, one of the best-known and most-celebrated artists in Denmark.  Meyer showed her paintings in many prestigious exhibitions throughout Denmark, and won several important awards in her lifetime, including the Louise Ravn-Hansen Scholarship and the Sødringske Encouragement Prize, which allowed her to take several small trips abroad.  She never married, probably in deference to the general consensus of the time that a female artist who married would need to forget their careers in order to focus on their domestic responsibilities.*  On October 8th, 1921, Meyer passed away, aged 62, and was buried at the Solbjerg Park Cemetery in Frederiksberg, alongside other famous artists including Vilhelm Kyhn, and her teachers, Luplau and Mundt.

Meyer is probably now best known for her painting Women Decorating Porcelain at De Kgl. Porcelænsfabrik, which she showed at the Charlottenborg Spring Exhibition in 1895.  It depicts an interior with female employees painting decorations on unfinished ceramics at the Royal Porcelain Factory in Copenhagen.  Likely among the women in the scene is Jenny Meyer (1866-1927), Emma's youngest sister.  Jenny, who pursued a more traditional route for female artists of the time, is arguably the more famous of the two sisters, having had her decorations exhibited more extensively, with inclusions at the World Exhibitions held in Chicago in 1893, and in Paris, 1925. Women Decorating Porcelain at De Kgl. Porcelænsfabrik was purchased in 1895 by the Kunstforeningen, one of the smaller museums in Copenhagen, which specialized in new works by young artists.  In 2011, the museum deaccessioned the work, selling it at the Brunn Rasmussen Auction House, where it garnered € 25,000, more than twice its high estimate. Presumably, it is now in a private collection.



*The influential teacher Vilhelm Kyhn infamously once told his student Anna Brøndum, upon learning of her decision to wed, "Now that you're getting married, put your art equipment in a wheelbarrow, take it down to the sea, and dump it.  You need to think about your duties as a housewife now."¹  Brøndum, who married fellow-artist Michael Ancher became one of the most famous painters of the artist colony at Skagen.  Kyhn was among the few 19th century artists in Denmark who trained women, and Anna Ancher is likely his most famous student, though Emilie Mundt and Marie Luplau also trained under his auspices.


¹ Sjoholm, Barbara, "What We Want:  The Art of Marie Luplau and Emilie Mundt,"Feminist Studies, Vol. 35, No. 3, The Politics of Embodiment, (Fall 2009), p. 550, as translated from the Danish, Mona Jensen and Birthe Møller Nielsen, "Tidens malende damer" in Kvindfolk:  en danmarkshistorie fra 1600 til 1980, ed. Anne Margrete Berg, Lis Frost, and Anne Olsen, (Copenhagen:  Gydendal, 1987), vol. 1, pg. 298.



What's On View: March 2014

$
0
0

Here are just a few exhibits and shows going on during the month of March. Most are in the mid-Atlantic area, and near to where I live, though several are events further afield which I wish I could attend. I will update the list and re-post it as I become aware of other exhibits of interest. Scroll to bottom for previews of upcoming months.

________________________________________
________________________________________



Desire and Pleasure in the Victorian Era:  Paintings from the Pérez-Simón Collection

Chiostro del Bramante (IT): February 16 - June 5, 2014
Leighton House Museum (UK):
  
________________________________________



National Academy Museum (NYC):  Anders Zorn:  Sweden's Master Painter
February 27 - May 18, 2014

________________________________________



Meadows Museum (TX): Sorolla & America
December 13, 2013 - April 19, 2014

________________________________________



Sirona Fine Art (FL): Dream within a Dream:  Dorian Vallejo
March 1 - 27, 2014

________________________________________



Ossining (NY): Nicole Moné:  Spanish Idylls
Private Viewings - call 917.403.2253
March 1 - 31

________________________________________



Maxwell Alexander Gallery (CA): The Last Pearl:  Vincent Xeus
March 8 - April 5, 2014

________________________________________


Rehs Contemporary Galleries (NYC): Heroes, Villains, Myths, & Legends
March 15 - April 11, 2014

________________________________________



Gardner Colby Galleries (FL): Frank P. Corso:  20 Years
March 5 - 22, 2014

________________________________________



James J. Riesser Fine Art (CA): Ray Roberts - The Monterey Coast:
Coastal Paintings from Monterey to Point Lobos
February 15 - April 27, 2014

________________________________________



Arcadia Contemporary (NYC): New Works
March 20 - April 3, 2014

________________________________________



Robert Lange Studios (SC): An Unfolding Pause:
Robert Lange
March 2014

________________________________________



Knowlton Gallery (CA): Atmospheric:  Group Show
February 25 - April 26, 2014

________________________________________



Overland Gallery (AZ): Joseph Lorusso
March 17 - 29, 2014

________________________________________



Skagen Museum (DK): Skawsum:  At Sea with Michael Ancher
February 1 - April 20, 2014

________________________________________


Gallery Russia (AZ): Marci Oleszkiewicz
March 13 - 27, 2014

________________________________________



Principle Gallery (VA): Lynn Boggess Solo Exhibition
February 21 - March 14, 2014

________________________________________



Gallery 1261 (CO): Small Works
February 28 - April 12, 2014

________________________________________



Greenhouse Gallery of Fine Art (TX): Western Art and Landscape
January 18 - February 22, 2014

________________________________________



Legacy Gallery (AZ): Legacy of the American West
March 6 -

________________________________________



Vose Galleries (MA): Liz Haywood-Sullivan
February 15 - March 28, 2014

________________________________________



Haynes Galleries (TN): The Landscape:  Views and Variations
March 14 - April 12, 2014

________________________________________


John Pence Gallery (CA):  Still Life, Floral, Trompe l'Oeil
March 10 - April 26, 2014

________________________________________



Howard/Mandville Gallery (WA): Renato Muccillo
March 22 - April 13, 2014

________________________________________



Art Gallery of Alberta (CA):  December 13, 2013 - March 9, 2014
Everson Museum of Art (NY):  April 17 - July 13, 2014
Milwaukee Art Museum (WI):  October 1, 2014 - January 4, 2015
Santa Barbara Museum of Art (CA):  February 6 - May 3, 2015

________________________________________



New York Historical Society (NYC): Beauty's Legacy:
Gilded Age Portraits in America
September 27, 2013 - March 9, 2014

________________________________________



Group Portraits from Amsterdam
March 10, 2012 - March 11, 2017




________________________________________

UPCOMING
________________________________________








________________________________________
________________________________________



At Auction: Edmund Blair Leighton

$
0
0

Edmund Blair Leighton
Study for In Time of Peril
5 ⅛  X 6 ⅜ in.
oil on panel


The upcoming sale of Victorian & British Impressionist Art is not one of Christie's more interesting offerings.  In the recent past, there has usually been one or two really outstanding pieces which have anchored the sale, but this time, such standouts are absent.  This is not to say that this auction is without its charms;  there are some nice landscapes by Edward Seago and the senior Alfred de Bréanski available, as well as a nice impressionist work by Harold Harvey among the lots.  But to me, the most interesting work up for bid is the "Study for In Time of Peril," by Edmund Blair Leighton (1852-1922).  It's a small sketch, only 5 ⅛ X 6 ⅜ inches in size, and not expected to fetch more than $2,000 USD, but its real value is likely to be found more among artists than collectors.  Blair Leighton's sketch, when compared to the finished work, offers valuable insight into his processes, and in his decision-making, including the changes he made in composition through tonal manipulation.

Christie's sale of of Victorian & British Impressionist Art will take place at 2:00 PM in London on March 12, 2014.  All 121 lots in the sale will be on view in South Kensington beginning March 8th.  For more information, and to see the sale catalog online, please visit the Christie's website.

Viewing Times
March 8  |  11am - 5pm
March 9  |  11am - 5pm
March 10  |  9am - 7:30pm
March 11  |  9am - 5pm
March 12  |  9am - 12pm

Edmund Blair Leighton's finished work, In Time of Peril (1897), is located in New Zealand at the Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki.  Fortunately, for those of us not living in New Zealand, the gallery has been digitized by the Google Art Project, which enable viewers to see In Time of Peril in great detail.


Edmund Blair Leighton
In Time of Peril
oil on canvas
49 X 66 ½ in.

In the Galleries: Dorian Vallejo - Dream Within a Dream

$
0
0

Drifting
oil on linen
58 X 67 in.


Each night, from his poppy-strewn cave in Erebos, near the kingdom of Hades, Hypnos, the son of Nyx, releases the Oneiroi upon the land.  These are Sleep's children, the Spirits of Dream, who, depending on which gate they pass through on their exodus from their grotto, bestow images upon those who are slumbering which are either false and without meaning, or that are god-sent and prophetic.  

There are many within this tribe of Hypnos, but three have skills far beyond their brother's.  There is Phantasos, who is responsible for the inanimate - earth, rock, water, and wood;  and there is Icelos, whom man calls Phobetor, who brings forth animals and monsters; and there is Morpheus, whose artistry in counterfeiting men - their voice, their gait, and even their moods - has made him superior among all his brothers.  It is Morpheus who is the chief shaper of dreams, and it is he who is responsible for the dreams of heroes and kings.

In The Dream Within a Dream, the new solo show from Pennsylvanian artist Dorian Vallejo, viewers are asked to step into the world of Morpheus, a place of in-between, a place where we must relinquish our control, our consciousness, and submit to our subconscious and the truth of who we are.  The show features paintings of innocence - in this case, the Jungian maiden - caught in the delicate balance between the lighter and darker aspects of her persona.  Filled with archetypical imagery, from the dangers of the forest to the transformative powers of fire, it is a fascinating exhibit, exquisitely rendered and carefully considered, and not to be missed if possible.

The Dream Within a Dream is currently on view at Sirona Fine Art, a new gallery in southern Florida which opened just this past December.  Headed by Timothy Smith, a gallery director with over two decades of experience in New York City, Sirona is an exciting new venue dedicated to bringing high-quality, contemporary, representational art to the greater Miami metro area. Its 8,200 square feet of display space has proved to be a perfect fit for Vallejo, whose 17 paintings range from 40 X 45 inches to 65 X 91 inches (most are at least 5 feet in one direction).  In addition to the paintings, the show also includes two dozen of Vallejo's inimitable drawings.

Sirona Fine Art is located at 600 Silks Run, in Hallandale Beach, Florida.  For more information, please contact the gallery at 954.454.9494, or visit the gallery's website at www.sironafineart.com. The Dream Within A Dream is on view now through March 27th.


Dissipate
oil on linen
53 X 70 in.

Ascent

Blossom
oil on linen
58 X 44 in.

Dreaming - Free Fall
oil on linen
73 X 45 in.

Becoming

Lightcatcher

Red Dance
oil on linen
77 X 44 in.

Light Dancer
oil on linen
40 X 45 in.

Sunlight Nude

Shadow Dance
oil on linen
55 X 57 in.

Sleeper

Bubble
oil on linen
51 X 42 in.

Dreamer In-Between
oil on linen
60 X 62 in.

Dream - Ripple

Awakening
oil on linen
65 X 91 in.

Internal Guide

Drawing 16

Dream Movement Study

Movement - Time

Thread

The Beauty of Internal Strength

Old School 22

Jessie

Penelope

Old School 23

Seated Nude

Drawing 9

Blue Lips

Breeze

Conscious

Fatima Study 2

Fatima Study 1

Fatima Study

Fatima Study 3

Dream

Potentialities of Life

Red

Pink Dressing

Self-Portrait


Charles R. Knight (1874-1953)

$
0
0

Born in 1870s Brooklyn and classified as legally blind for most of his life, Charles R. Knight was probably one of the least likely candidates for becoming a wildlife artist.  Nevertheless, with an innate love for animals and a persistence at his work - mixed with a healthy dose of serendipity - Knight would become world-reknown, and esteemed peers in his field, including Jean-Léon Gérôme and Emmanuel Frémiet, would come to declare Knight's drawings of animals, birds, and reptiles, "the most perfect they had ever seen."¹ 






Though it may seem unlikely now, late 19th century metropolitan New York was a place of many opportunities for a child in love with animals.  Nationally, it was a period dedicated to animal discovery:  Charles Darwin had only recently published his book Descent of Man, the "Bone Wars" between paleontologists Edward Cope and Othniel Marsh were raging in the American West, and conservationists like Theodore Roosevelt were raising concerns that certain species of wildlife were facing extinction if steps to protect them were not to be taken.  Locally, these activities bolstered museums, such as the American Museum of Natural History, which filled its halls with dinosaur skeletons and taxidermic animals from around the world;  and fostered zoos, such as the Bronx Zoological Park, which sought to inspire visitors with an active appreciation of nature and wildlife.  If animals were a ripe topic, then New York City, with its intellectuals, universities, philanthropic organizations, and media outlets, was the center of the garden.





Knight, who fell in love with animals through the illustrations he saw in his family's household dictionary, was fortunate that his father indulged the boy in his interests.  Frequently, Knight and his father would travel into Manhattan and attend the Central Park Zoo and the American Museum of Natural History, which Knight described as more or less satisfying his "juvenile yearnings," while at the same time gradually training his eyes to observe with ever-increasing accuracy just what shapes and figures constituted the animal life in the world about himself.²  But though these institutions were open to the public, Knight's visits, particularly those to the Museum of Natural History, were far different from the experiences of the ordinary museum-goer.  The young Knight, as the child of an employee of J.P. Morgan (Knight's father was Morgan's private secretary, and Morgan was the treasurer of the museum), had access to the museum on Sundays, when it was closed to the public, and he had free roam backstairs where he could watch the exhibition builders and taxidermists at work.  It was an intense immersion which likely gave the young man knowledge far beyond his seniors already drawing wildlife.






As a teen, he attended the Metropolitan Museum of Art School, and also the School of Visual Arts, both in Manhattan, and by age sixteen, he had left home and was earning his living as an artist.  He began working for a stained glass studio where he was regularly assigned to to design animal panels, and his illustrations of animals began appearing in all of the popular magazines of the day.  But it was one particular chance assignment when he was 20 which would set him apart, and set the course for his artistic output for the reminder of his career.




In 1894, during one of his many visits to the the Museum of Natural History, a friend in the taxidermy studio named John Rowley mentioned to Knight that there was an in-house project that might be of interest to him.  "There was a man named Dr. Wortman here yesterday, from upstairs in the Fossil Department," offered Rowley, "and he was looking for someone who might make him a drawing of a pre-historic animal.  I said I believed you could do it, so why don't you go up and see him?"³  The result was a black and white watercolor of an Elotherium (also known as Entolodon), an extinct, pig-like creature which died out in the Oligocene period, and the painting was so successful at bringing life to the fossilized remains, that Knight became inseparable from the museum's "restoration" team.  It was a major advancement in paleontology, and Knight's re-imagined extinct creatures – in combination with the museum's radical decision to mount their fossils in life-like poses, rather than to present them as they had been found, still imbedded in rock – created a wild surge of interest in pre-historic life.






With his advanced knowledge of animal skeletal and muscular systems, and a preternatural understanding of animal psychology gleaned from years of observation, Knight was able to set the standard for re-creating extinct life in drawing, painting, and sculpture.  His collaborations with scientists over the next 40 years were groundbreaking, and were responsible for influencing the way the public perceives dinosaurs, from the average T-rex-loving 5-year-old, to the special effects teams working on the multi-million dollar, creature films of today.






By the 1950s, Knight's progressively worsening eyesight had plunged him into a world of darkness.  No longer able to produce artwork, he slipped into a deep depression, and in 1953, at the age of 79, he suffered his final heart attack and passed away.  And though his name was rather quickly forgotten, his legacy was not;  he is without question the father of Paleoart, and his influence is still felt worldwide.





––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––


¹ Milner, Richard, Charles R. Knight:  The Artist Who Saw Through Time, (Abrams, New York, 2012), p. 47, in a letter to Henry Fairfield Osborn, President of the American Museum of Natural History, from the American sculptor Eli Harvey dated September 30, 1904.
² Milner, p. 11.
³ Milner, p. 52, from Charles R. Knight:  Autobiography of an Artist, (GT Labs, Ann Arbor, 2005).


Techniques & Tools: David Gray Demonstrates the "Oil Transfer"

$
0
0



In a recent post I discussed the various methods I use to transfer my original drawings to my canvas. The technique which drew the most attention was the "oil transfer," in which the outline of the drawing is transmitted to the working service using a transfer sheet coated in oil paint.  The result is a good copy, which does not run nor muddy the next layer of paint, and is as permanent as if it had been painted directly with a fine brush.

Shortly after my post, artist David Gray, posted an online video showing his process for doing the oil transfer.  I have included it below (along with some still images), but if you have not yet seen his videos, take the time to visit YouTube and watch all of his tutorials which he has so generously shared on his personal channel. You can also visit his website at www.davidgrayart.com, where you can see more examples of his artwork, and check out his upcoming workshops to see if his next class will be in your area.












Suggested Donation Podcast

$
0
0

There are some artists who like working in complete silence, but I am not one of them.  I find that I need something else to occupy the attention of a particular level of my brain that would, if not so engaged, send me messages of self-doubt and criticism while I am painting.  If that negative side of my psyche is distracted, I can get more of what needs to be done, done.  I somewhat equate the need for this lack of silence to the need I feel for the DVD player in my minivan:  if my kids were not otherwise occupied by an in-trip movie, I would have three unwelcome backseat drivers commenting on my every move and making my drive harder than it needs to be.

For me, listening to stories while I paint has been great.  I listened to audiobooks for years, but after nearly exhausting the collection at the local library, I switched over to podcasts.  Some of my favorite programs have been Old Time Radio Mysteries, The Moth, Radiolab, This American Life, and Stuff You Missed in History Class.  They have been entertaining, informative, and inspiring (I have even compiled a page of painting ideas that were generated while tuned into these broadcasts).

As soon as I find a podcast I like, I download all of the available episodes and work my way through the archives.  But just like the audiobooks, I eventually burn my way through what I have.  Therefore, I am always on the lookout for another quality show to which I can subscribe.




You can imagine my delight then, just when I had nearly emptied my digital library, that I learned that there was a new podcast being published – and not just any podcast – but one about art, hosted by two representational artists!  The new show, Suggested Donation, is the brainchild of Tony Curanaj and Edward Minoff, two (not necessarily) reformed New York City graffiti artists who are now tops in the field of representational art.  It's their hope that using this modern medium to share interviews with both traditional and non-traditional artists and craftsmen, curators, and restorers, that they can "alter the very landscape of the contemporary art world, one conversation at a time."


Tony Curanaj  -  Nouveau Red

Edward Minoff  -  Stormy


There have been three episodes of Suggested Donation so far, with the most recent – a two-parter – airing on March 13th.  In the first episode, listeners learn how two hoodlums met in the Amtrak Freedom Tunnel on the Upper West Side 20 years ago and bonded over Old Master paintings, before going on to become instructors at the Grand Central Academy.  The second episode features an interview with the brilliant Graydon Parrish who talks about his own art education and about the benefits of the Munsell Color Indexing System.  And the latest show spotlights painter Patricia Watwood, fresh off the success of her "Venus Apocalypse" solo show, talking about the feminine perspective in relation to the female nude, and about the future of painting.


Patricia Watwood  -  Venus Awakes

Graydon Parrish  -  Cycle of Terror and Tragedy


Upcoming podcasts will feature interviews with guests ranging from tattoo and graffiti artists to chefs and an artisanal bicycle maker.  Curanaj and Minoff hope that these discussions will create a dialog through which they can discover a "common ground across disciplines and spaces united by a love of, and deep devotion to, skill."

I have listened to all three episodes, and I have greatly enjoyed them all.  There has been something in each podcast that has resonated with me and my pursuit of art, and with my thoughts on art.  And even though it would be be even better to sit around and have these discussions in person, it's still been really nice having everyone here with me in my studio.

You can listen to Suggested Donation at the podcast's website, or at iTunes, where you can subscribe for free and receive automatic downloads to your media player as each new episode is published.  




In the Galleries: Heroes, Villains, Myths, Legends at Rehs Contemporary Galleries, NYC

$
0
0

Elena Green
The Eye of the Day
16 X 22 inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

As a sequel to last year's successful show, The BIG Gamble, Rehs Contemporary Galleries in New York City is hosting a new exhibit of works by instructors, apprentices, students, and alumni of the Ani Academies.  This new show, Heroes, Villains, Myths, Legends, comprises more than 60 works of imaginative, realist art by 58 artists.  As the motif of the show lends itself to the current – or rather, perennial – universal love of fantasy and science fiction, it is the perfect vehicle for presenting the iconography for which the Ani Academies are known.  From the Lone Ranger to Spider-Man, Ghost Rider to the Sandman, Darth Vader to the family dog, and Jason Voorhees to Mary Magdalene, each artist has brought their unique perspective on heroes and scoundrels to life in tightly-rendered detail.

From the gallery press release:
Realism has been overpowered by pop and abstract art for some time and we’re at a point where many are left thinking, “Where is the talent?” How many times do we have to walk out of a contemporary art exhibit and say to ourselves, “Well… a 5 year old could have done that!” It is time that Realism steps out of the shadows of the art world and takes its place in the spotlight, where truly talented and devoted artists are appreciated for their refined skill and dedication. The rigorous training at the Ani Art Academies develops artists who create “shock-value,” but in a very different way than most contemporary artists do. With shockingly precise and realistic charcoals and oil paintings, these young artists will make you rethink your views on the art world of today as they present works inspired by characters and stories they love. Take a journey with the Ani instructors, apprentices, students and alumni into another world, a world of Heroes, Villains, Myths & Legends.

Heroes, Villains, Myths, Legends opened on March 15th and will remain on view through April 11th.  Rehs Contemporary Galleries, Inc. is located on the 8th floor of 5 East 57th Street in Manhattan.  It is open during this show Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:30 PM.

For more information on the show, or to see additional images, please visit www.rehscgi.com, or call 212.355.5710.  To learn more about the Ani Art Academies, please visit www.aniwaichulis.com or www.aniartacademies.org.


Anthony Waichulis
Hi-Yo Silver
7 X 5 inches
oil on panel

Rodney O'Dell Davis
The Dark Side of the Force
10 X 8 inches
oil on panel

Erin Anderson
Aphrodite
20 X 16 inches
oil on copper

Catherine Acosta
Habia una Vez
10 ¼ X 8 ¼ inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

Patricia Diaz
Ride Between Life and Death
14 X 11 inches
gouache and black crayon

Brandon D. Drake
Absolution
20 X 23 inches
oil on panel

Omar Rodriguez, Jr.
Imposters
13 X 8 inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

Timothy W. Jahn
Symbiote
21 X 12 inches
oil on panel

Lynnes Garlick
The Sword & the Chalice
22 X 12 inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

Emma Hirst
Icarus Flies to Selene
10 X 8 inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

Welinton Medina-Lopez
Poseidon
10 X 8 inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

Victoria Steel
The Sandman
11 ½ X 9 ½ inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

Shanicia Richardson
Poisoned Apples
12 X 18 inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

Helen Crispino
The Once and Mighty King
5 ½ X 7 inches
oil on panel

Jay Davenport
Got Your Back
20 X 27 inches
oil on panel

Felix Rosario
Ciguapa
10 ½ X 13 ¼ inches
charcoal and pastel on paper

Jason Brady
Pyrrhic Victory
18 ½ X 23 inches
charcoal and pastel on paper



Words of Wisdom: Charles R. Knight

$
0
0

During his lifetime, wildlife and Paleo- artist Charles Knight wrote several books, mostly on the topic of pre-history.  One of his books, however, Animal Anatomy and Psychology for Artists and Laymen (1947) was intended for aspiring wildlife artists.  It is filled with his advice on understanding animals, as well as with many of his excellent drawings.  Most of the following quotes come from that book, but many can also be found in the recent biography, Charles R. Knight:  The Artist Who Saw Through Time by Richard Milner.  Milner's book is a short but very interesting read, and offers a wonderful insight into Knight's life;  Knight's drawing book, now titled Animal Drawing:  Anatomy and Action for Artists is still available for purchase as a Dover Editions reprint, and it is as much an autobiography as a collection of his animal studies.

What made Knight unique among his contemporaries in wildlife art was his emphasis on understanding the "psychology" of animals.  Many believed that it was ability to recognize the emotions and motives of animals that allowed him to excel at representing many species of animals, rather than being a specialist, and that this empathy also aided in his ability to render scenes of extinct animals convincingly.

-----------------------------------------------


. . .  it is a matter of prime necessity for the artist to examine not only the anatomy but also the mental traits of an animal before he can properly represent a lifelike attitude, in either action or relaxation.  The artist must also study the actual appearance of a three-dimensional object with all its diversified planes, light and shade effects, color pattern, and skin embellishments– hair, feathers, scales, etc., as the case may be.

. . . every artist, no matter what his individual proclivities, should study and learn as much as possible of the general as well as the particular phases of his profession in order to do his best in any special line.  In other words, sound academic drawing of all objects, be they plaster casts, human figures, animals, or landscapes, is a prime necessity for all of us.  Painting, its color qualities, light and shade, atmosphere, values, and all other things that go with this section of art work, should of course be studied constantly.  Composition, an enormously important part of art work, necessarily should occupy much of our attention, and the various mediums best suited for certain types of impression should be understood and experimented with.




We must remember that we are faced with a very difficult but fascinating problem when attempting the study of animal life and that in order to attain even a modicum of perfection we must realize that a tough job lies before us.   Without hard work, constant application and study, and a proper reverence for the beauty of created forms, we shall not be able to reach our objective.




For the purpose of the artist, a profound knowledge of the deeper muscular anatomy is not absolutely necessary, though some of us may find pleasure and profit in such a line of research.  What we should all like to know, however, is the general structure and proportions of the bony skeleton and the principal overlying sets of muscles that cover it at almost every point and control the actions of the bones themselves.  The proposition before us really resolves into four or five divisions in the case of most animals under discussion, of which the following are typical examples.
     1.  The bony structure– its proportions and characteristic attitudes in different species of animals.
     2.  The principal muscles and tendons covering this skeleton– their shapes, sizes, and general functions.
     3.  The actual appearance of a given animal in life– its color, hair disposition, and character– and the effect of the underlying structure on the exterior as a whole.
     4.  The psychology of the animal– a very important feature, for without accurate knowledge on this point we are unable to visualize properly the creature as a living emotional entity.  Each species will naturally exhibit its own particular attributes in this respect.
     5. The artistic possibilities of certain animals, some species being wonderful in color, others in form, still others in mere picturesqueness or grotesque qualities.

Animals are solid, three-dimensional, animated beings and must be so regarded by the artist and treated accordingly in his paintings and models.

Owing to the protective coloring of most of the cats, both the general form and the muscular anatomy may be very much concealed by the maze of stripes, spots, and irregular markings that constitute a great number of their skin patterns.  For this reason it is advisable for a novice to study the lion and the puma, whose most monotone coloring discloses the muscular form to advantage.




Because of the elephant's bulk the planes of the body are very evident in a strong light but not so noticeable from a near view or in poor illumination.  For this reason it is always advisable when possible to look at an elephant in the open and in bright sunlight, when the lights and shadows on the body will be much more evident.  Too many attempts fail miserably to represent the creature because the artist knew nothing of these planes;  the result can be only a rounded, stuffed-looking production without any true character.




. . . we may reiterate the necessity for a most careful study of comparison of the shoulder region in man and his fellow mammals.  We may also stress the fact that the point of juncture of the humerus and shoulder blade is of paramount interest to the student.  In man it is more or less fixed in place, whereas in other animals it moves forward and backwards as the creature walks or runs.

Make it a rule to study carefully the species upon which you are to work. . .

Drawing with character (is) simply another name for knowledge of what you are doing.

You should acquaint yourself at least superficially with the psychological traits of the particular type of creature on which you are working.

There will be (and should be) many days when you will make no attempt to draw your model but will merely absorb the various actions and reactions of the different species – how an antelope looks when alarmed or angry, a snarling wolf or fox, or enraged tiger, or the antics of a group of young lions.

. . . it will be of great benefit if you will learn to classify the different types under observation, realizing that all the species of one great race will act in pretty much the same way under similar similar conditions.

It will be well also to read books on the subject of animals in a wild state, their habits and environment and all other data concerning them.  Such reading will stimulate and interest you and give you much insight into animals' special modes of existence, all of which will be a help when you come to draw them.

For drawing, nothing that I have ever used can quite compare with the good lead pencil for flexibility, convenience, speed, and durability.  Pencil also . . . has the great advantage of being easily removed in case a mistake has been made.




Another little trick that I have found very advantageous is to make at some point in your work a small model either in plastilene or in clay, indicating carefully and completely the construction, silhouette, and principal planes.  This is a scheme quite commonly used by animal painters, as it crystalizes the three-dimensional effect.  If this model is then placed in the sun, perfectly convincing cast shadows can be secured, shapes very difficult to imagine but that will add greatly to the finished effect of your picture.




Water color either pure or with white (gouache) lends itself readily to many forms of animal painting

Without doubt, when it comes to painting large finished pictures of animals against a background, there is no medium that quite compares with oil.

From a sculptural angle, animals offer some of the very finest opportunities for artistic expression.

. . . anyone drawing in a public place is an absolute lodestone.  Most persons are attracted to such a one-man exhibition in a most surprising degree.  Almost all of these, you will find, are merely curious and politely interested, but others take advantage of one's helplessness to impress one with the fact that a certain ethical cousin , who "never took a lesson in her life," can "sit right down and draw a perfect portrait of anyone in five minutes." I've always wanted to meet that gifted relative, but without seeing her work I rather imagine I can guess just how much it's worth.  It's a dreadful bore, of course, but you must learn to ignore all these little interruptions and try to concentrate on the business at hand, which is, Heaven knows, difficult enough under the best conditions.

Today with the excellent lenses of the modern camera, splendid snapshots of wild animals are easily obtained.  Consult but do not copy from these often superb examples of photographic art.




I never make any direct use of photographs, for then I should have to credit the photographer.  My work is always strictly original and I use a photograph merely as a reminder.

Remember too that above all it is art we are seeking to experience . . . that our own individualities are being consulted at all times, and that the better artists we strive to become the finer will be our productions in the field of art expression.

 . . . drawing is drawing, no matter what the subject, and exactly the same rules of light, shade, contour, perspective, and construction apply equally well in every instance.

[We] work more or less from the inside out to do a really fine painting of an animal and no amount of merely artistic technique in the superficial finish of our production will compensate for a lack of knowledge on this vital point.  Both mentally and physically we must to a certain extent "feel" the attitude we wish to portray in order to grasp the coordinated rhythm of the animal's body and mind under a given stimulus of emotion.  Lack of knowledge on this important point is what makes so many attempts at animal portrayal rather poor, meaningless accomplishments without truth or interest.




We as artists are not making as much of the unparalleled opportunities for study of animal life that our great zoos and museums afford.  Think of how many fine subjects there are for artistic compositions if we would only make use of them.  A tiger, for instance, coming out to drink at dusk, the last rays of the sun glinting on the splendid striped coat as the creature stoops to lap the water from some quiet pool.  Could anything be finer as a subject for a great painting?  Yet we ignore this and hundreds of other equally splendid subjects in our picture exhibitions and confine ourselves to trite and much overdone compositions from which all originality has long since departed.

All artwork should be undertaken as a joy and a pleasure, not as mere drudgery. . . . To explore even a few of these mysteries . . . will surely demonstrate very convincingly the joy of deeper understanding of Nature's story.




Don't let anything happen to my drawings!  (Charles R. Knight's last words)




        



At Auction: Bonhams: California & Western Paintings & Sculpture

$
0
0

Dennis Doheny (American, b. 1956)
Coastal Spring, 2007
oil on canvas
24 X 30 in.


Bonham's Auctions will be holding another of their popular sales of California & Western Paintings & Sculpture on April 8th, 2014, at 6:00 PM PDT.   Among the artists represented are such notables as E.I. Couse, William Wendt, Maynard Dixon, John Marshall Gamble, Granville Redmond, and Dennis Doheny. Edgar Payne, the perennial favorite, is also represented in the sale with a total of 10 paintings available for purchase.  All 190 lots of the auction are available for viewing online, and also in person, at Bonham's salesrooms in both California locations.  Live bidding will take place in Los Angeles on the 8th with a simulcast to San Francisco.  

The preview times are as follows:


March 28, 2014     –     12:00 - 5:00 PM
March 29, 2014     –     12:00 - 5:00 PM
March 30, 2014     –     12:00 - 5:00 PM


April 04, 2014     –     12:00 - 5:00 PM
April 05, 2014     –     12:00 - 5:00 PM
April 06, 2014     –     12:00 - 5:00 PM
April 07, 2014     –     12:00 - 5:00 PM


Granville Redmond (American, 1871-1935)
Annandale Wildflowers
oil on board
25 X 30 in.

William Franklin Johnson (American 1850-1936)
Wild Flowers with Mount Tamalpais Beyond
oil on board
10 X 14 in.

John Marshall Gamble (American, 1863-1957)
Bush Lupine, Seaside
oil on board
18 X 24 in.

Edgar Payne (1883-1947)
California Landscape
oil on board
11 ½ X 15 ½ in.

William Wendt (American, 1865-1946)
The Top of the Hill near San Luis Obispo, 1926
oil on canvas
24 ½ X 29 ½ in.

William Wendt (American, 1865-1946)
California Hills
oil on canvas
25 X 30 in.

Edgar Payne (1883-1947)
Capistrano Canyon
oil on canvas
24 X 28 in.

Elmer Wachtel (American, 1864-1929)
Hills in the Sunlight
oil on canvas
14 ¼ X 18 ¼ in.

John Frost (American, 1890-1937)
Lone Pine Peak, 1924
oil on canvas
30 X 36 in.

Hanson Puthuff (American, 1875-1972)
Hill Slopes
oil on canvas
28 X 36 in.

Maurice Braun (American, 1877-1941)
Sycamores and Hills
oil on canvas
25 ¼ X 30 in.

Maurice Braun (American, 1877-1941)
Autumn Oaks
oil on canvas
25 X 30 in.

John Marshall Gamble (American, 1863-1957) and Fernand Lungren (American, 1857-1932)
Cottonwoods and Rabbit Brush
oil on canvas
16 X 24 in.

Granville Redmond (American, 1871-1935)
In the Afternoon, Menlo Park, California, 1911
oil on canvas
26 X 38 in.

Paul Grimm (1891-1974)
Nature's Power
oil on canvas
30 X 40 in.

Edgar Payne (1883-1947)
Sierra Snow, Bishop
oil on canvas
16 X 20 in.

Percy Gray (1869-1952)
Eucalyptus on a Pond, 1917
watercolor on paper
15 ¾ X 19 ¾  in.

Percy Gray (1869-1952)
Eucalyptus in the California Hills, 1922
watercolor on paperboard affixed to board
12 X 16 in.

Paul A. Grimm (American, 1891-1974)
Eucalyptus Grove, 1934
oil on board
12 X 16 in.

John Marshall Gamble (American, 1863, 1957)
Twilight, Hope Ranch, Santa Barbara
oil on canvas
20 X 26 in.

David Chapple (American, b. 1947)
California Back Road
oil on canvas affixed to board
24 X 30 in.

David Chapple (American, b. 1947)
Summer Pond
oil on canvas affixed to board
24 X 30 in.

William Wendt (American, 1865-1946)
View of Mount Baldy, 1916
oil on canvas
25 X 30 in.

Edgar Payne (1883-1947)
Lake Lucerne, Switzerland
oil on canvas
29 X 29 in.

Arthur Hill Gilbert (American, 1894-1970)
The Sentinel, Monterey Coast
oil on canvas
30 ¼ X 28 ¼ in.

William Frederick Ritschel (American, 1864-1949)
Vikings in the Glow of the Midnight Sun
oil on canvas
40 ¼ X 45 in.

Edgar Payne (1883-1947)
Italian Fishing Boats
oil on canvas affixed to board
14 ½ X 14 ¾ in.

Edgar Payne (1883-1947)
Sailboats on the Adriatic
oil on canvas
16 ¼ X 20 ¼ in.

Edgar Payne (1883-1947)
Italian Fishing Boats in a Harbor
oil on board
30 ½ X 30 ½ in.

Arthur Grover Rider (American, 1886-1975)
Drying the Sail
oil on canvas
17 X 20 in.

William Frederick Ritschel (American, 1864-1949)
Northern California Coast
oil on canvas board
20 X 24 in.

Robert Wesley Amick (American, 1879-1969)
Indians in Ambush on a Wagon Train
oil on canvas
18 X 30 in.

Eanger Irving Couse (American, 1866-1936)
The Cornhusker
oil on canvas board
8 X 10 in.

Frank McCarthy (American, 1924-2002)
The Scouts
oil on board
9 X 12 in.

Donald Crowley (American, b. 1926)
Mountain Trail
oil on canvas
36 X 24 in.

Bonnie Marris (American, b. 1951)
The High Life (Salute to Summer)
oil on canvas
22 X 36 in.




At Auction: Sotheby's - The Orientalist Sale

$
0
0

Jean-Léon Gérôme (French, 1824-1904)
Bashi-Bazouk
oil on canvas
10 ¼ X 8 ½ in.

As part of the upcoming Orientalist & Islamic Week at Sotheby's, a special auction of Orientalist Art is being held on April 8th in London. The Orientalist Sale, though rather small in scope with only 39 lots, contains a finer selection of exemplars of the genre than are often found in larger sales.  Among the lots is a beautiful small portrait of an Egyptian soldier by Jean-Léon Gérôme, several nice works by Rudolf Ernst and Frederick Arthur Bridgman including a painting which was once in Andy Warhol's secret art collection, and an unusual piece in both scale and style by Ludwig Deutsch.  This genre, like others in the realm of representationalism, fell out of favor in the 20th century, but has been making a comeback in recent years, especially among collectors from the regions depicted in the artworks, who now recognize the important role many of these artists played in recording history.

The Orientalist Sale will take place at 2:30 PM BST at Sotheby's New Bond Street location in London.  Prior to the sale, the auction items can be viewed online, and in person.  The preview schedule is as follows:


Fri, 04 Apr 14 | 09:00 AM - 04:30 PM BST
Sun, 06 Apr 14 | 12:00 PM - 05:00 PM BST
Mon, 07 Apr 14 | 09:00 AM - 04:30 PM BST
Tue, 08 Apr 14 | 09:00 AM - 12:00 PM BST


Jean-Léon Gérôme  -  Bashi-Bazouk (detail)


Franz Kosler (Austrian, 1864-1905)
The Fortune Teller of Cairo
oil on canvas
22 ¾ X 27 ½ in.


Rudolf Weisse (Bohemian, 1859- )
The Dice Players
oil on panel
23 ½ X 32 in.


Rudolf Weisse (Bohemian, 1859- )
The Palace Guard
oil on panel
18 X 12 ¼ in.


Frederick Arthur Bridgman (American, 1847-1928)
Idle Moments
oil on canvas
30 X 24 ¾ in.

Frederick Arthur Bridgman (American, 1847-1928)
The Sewing Lesson
oil on canvas
33 ¼ X 26 ½ in.


Rudolf Ernst (Austrian, 1854-1932)
The Perfume Makers
oil on panel
36 ¼ X 28 ¼ in.


Frederick Arthur Bridgman (American, 1847-1928)
La jour du prophète à Blidah, en Algerie
oil on canvas
26 X 21 ½ in.


Etienne Dinet (French, 1861-1929)
La Prière
oil on canvas
9 ¾ X 14 ½ in.


Pietro Calvi (Italian, 1833-1884)
Bust of Othello, The Moor of Venice
white marble set with bronze, on a white marble socle
33 ¼ in.


Ludwig Deutsch (Austrian, 1855-1935)
The Procession of the Mahmal Through the Streets of Cairo
oil on canvas
111 ¾ X 115 ¾ in.


Etienne Dinet (French, 1861-1929)
Jeunes filles à leur toilette
oil on canvas
25 ¼ X 31 ½ in.


Adam Styka (Polish, 1890-1959)
Crossing the Wadi
oil on canvas
15 X 18 in.


Otto Pilny (Swiss, 1866-1936)
Evening Prayers in the Dessert
oil on canvas
47 ¼ X 71 ¾ in.


Adolf Schreyer (German, 1828-1899)
Arab Warriors
oil on canvas
23 ¾ X 32 ½ in.

Etienne Dinet (French, 1861-1929)
Conciliabule dans la nuit
oil on canvas
44 ½ X 57 in.

Rudolf Ernst (Austrian, 1854-1932)
Prayers at Sunset
oil on panel
31 X 39 ½ in.



Words of Wisdom: William Bouguereau

$
0
0


"Before setting to work, be completely penetrated by your subject.  If you do not understand it, seek out or do something else.  Remember that everything must first be thought out, forgetting nothing, down to the smallest detail.  Then think of the layout, the colors, and the arrangement.  Do no work without thinking of all those things too, for nature, your only true master, has forgotten nothing.  Never deviate from these principles and you will not be a mediocre painter. . .  Character comes from a proper understanding of the truth. . .  Various things have led me to think, rightly, that the artist must discover all composition and arrangement within himself, that he must take his inspiration from Nature, though never counting on her;  for often we do not find until tomorrow what we needed yesterday. . .  Every living moment must be spent in study. . .  Let us always keep this great truth in mind. . . "







Viewing all 214 articles
Browse latest View live